Consortia As Public Network. The Case Of An Italian Industrial Consortium

Author(s)

Raffaele Trequattrini , Federica Ricci , Ida Samantha Gilvari - ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 81-87 | Views: 329 | Downloads: 101 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3462961

Volume 4 - October 2015 (10)

Abstract

This research is placed in the literature under the subject of public networks for the development of territorial areas. Generally, studies on organizational strategy on the network are heading to more specialized areas of research. A topic that has recently been gaining an increasing interest is the influence of the social environment on the behavior and performance of the network of public and individual members (Meneguzzo, Cepiku, 2008). The work takes as a reference the case of industrial consortia - legal institutions governing joint initiatives for the conduct of certain business activities - both by private and public entities. In particular, it aims to provide an alternative reading that revisits the industrial consortium as an intermediate solution in the management of public goods (Ostrom, 1990). On the theoretical basis of Ostrom’s approach (1990), the work aims to provide an alternative reading for the governance of industrial consortia, because there wouldn’t be the only public/private dichotomy, but rather a plurality of combinations. Using a qualitative research methodology, the study will be enriched by a case history of an Italian industrial consortium, located in the Lazio region. 

Keywords

 Industrial consortia, public network.

References

  1. Agranoff R., 2003, Leveraging Networks: A Guide for Public Managers Working across Organizations, IBM Endowment for the Business of Government, Washinghton DC.
  2. Agranoff R., McGuire M., 2001, Big questions in Public Network Management Research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 11, 3.
  3. Berry F.S., Brower R.S., Ok Choi S., Goa W.X., Jang H.S., Kwon M. and Word J., 2004, The traditions of network research: what the public management research what the public management research agenda can learn from other research communities. Public Administration Review, no. 64/5.
  4. Cepiku D., Meneguzzo M., 2004, Public sector networks: What can we learn from different appoaches? in S. Osborne et al., Challengs of public management reforms. Theoretical perspectives and recommendations, IRSPM – Budapest University, Hungary.
  5. Cuccurullo C., 2005. Le collaborazioni tra pubblico e privato in sanità. Meccanismi di Governance, Cedam, Padova.
  6. Cuccurullo C., 2008, Le implicazioni strategiche dei network pubblici, in M. Meneguzzo (eds.), Network pubblici, McGraw Hill, Milano.
  7. Friend J.K., Power J.M. and Yewlett C.J.L., 1974, Public Planning: the Inter-corporate Dimension, Preager, New York/London.
  8. Hanf K., Scharpf F.W. (eds.), 1978, Interorganisational Policy Making, Sage, London.
  9. Hardin G., 1968, The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, no.162.
  10. Kickert W.J.M., Klijn E-H., Koppenjan J. (eds.), 1967, Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, Sage Publications, London.
  11. Kickert W.J.M., Koppenjan J., 1997, Public Management and Network Management: An Overview in W.J.M. Kickert, E-H. Klijn and J. Koppenjan (eds.), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, Sage Publications, London.
  12. Longo F., 2005, Governance dei network di pubblico interesse, Egea, Milano. Meneguzzo M. (eds.), 2008, Network pubblici, McGraw.Hill Companies, Milano. 
  13. O’ Toole L., 1997, Treating networks seriously: pratical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, no. 57.
  14. Oliver A., Ebers M., 1998, Networking network studies. An analysis of conceptual configurations. The study of interorganizational relationship, Organizations studies Issue, no. 4.
  15. Osborne S. et al., 2004, Challengs of public management reforms. Theoretical perspectives and recommendations, IRSPM – Budapest University, Hungary.
  16. Ostrom E., 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press.
  17. Provan K.G., Kenis P., 2007, Modes of network governance: Structure, management and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, no.18.
  18. Provan K.G., Kenis P., 2009, Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration.
  19. Provan K.G., Milward H.B., 2001, Do Networks really work?. Public Administration Review, n. 61.
  20. Rittel H., Webber M., 1973, Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, no.4, Elsevier Scientific Publishing, Amsterdam.
  21. Scharpf F.W., 1978, Interorganizational Policy Studies: Issuees, Concepts and Perspectives, in Hanf K., Scharpf F.W. (eds.), Interorganisational Policy Making, Sage, London.

Cite this Article: