Factors That Hinders The Women’s Representation At Top Management.

Author(s)

Dr. Qudsia Batool ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 200-207 | Views: 315 | Downloads: 98 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3468683

Volume 5 - December 2016 (12)

Abstract

Management is an occupational area where women are severely underrepresented. The lack of women in top management position has been the subject of much debate in developed countries. It is clear that women all over the world are underrepresented and face discrimination on the basis of gender. There are some stereotypes about women managers that undermine their representation at top management position. The study explores the factors that undermine the women’s representation at top management positions in universities of Pakistan. The objectives of the study are to overview the existing situation of women in management of universities and to identify the factors that cause the underepresentation of women. Both primary and secondary data was used in the study. Data was collected through five point Likert scale. The analyses were done through SPSS applying correlation and chi-square test. Findings show that socio-cultural factors such as Mobility, lack of family support, domestic responsibilities, stereotyping and gender discrimination undermine the women’s representation at top management position. Unbiased representation of women in management is an important issue of human resource management. Gender equity policy, gender mainstreaming, awareness and sensitization at all level to increase the representation of women at top management positions to reduce the gender gap in universities

Keywords

Higher Education, Management, Stereotype, Gender equity, Gender Discrimination

References

  1. Amondi, O, 2011. Representation of women in top educational management and leadership positions in Kenya. Journal of advancing women in leadership, 31: 57-68.
  2. Benschop,Y & Brounds, M. 2003. Crumbling ivory towards: Academic organizing and its gender effects. Gender, work and organization, 10(2) : 194-212.
  3. Calas, M., & Smirich, L. 2006. From the women‟s point of view ten years later: towards a feminist organization studies. Sage handbook of organization studies,2nd edition, 284-346.
  4. Catalyst. 2003. Facts about working women. National Education Association.
  5. Dines, E. 1993. Women in higher Education management. Paris UNESCO Commonwealth Secretariat.
  6. Djajadikerta.H., & Trireksani, T. 2007. Predictors of women Academics „career progression: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Asian Academy of Management journal, 12(1):51-68.
  7. Easterly ,D., & Pemberton, C. 2008. Understanding barriers and supports to proposal writing as perceived by female associate Professors: Achieving Promotion to professor. Research Management Review, 16(1) 1- 17.
  8. Foster, N. 2001. A case study of women academics views on equal opportunities, career prospects and work family conflicts in UK university. journal of career development international, 6: 28-38.
  9. Gunawardena, C. 1998. Managers of OUSL: A comparison of men and women. paper presented at the sixth National Convention on women, CENVOR Colombo, 19-21.
  10. Lund, H. 1998. A Single Sex Profession? Female Staff numbers in commonwealth universities. Commonwealth Higher education Management service London
  11. Neale, J., & Ozkanli, O.2010. Organizational Barriers for Women in Senior Management: A Comparison of Turkish and Newzealand Universities.
  12. Ramsay, E. 2000. Women And leadership in higher education: Facing international challenges and maximizing opportunities. Keynote address: University of South Australia.
  13. Wallace, M. 2006.The Paradox and the price: A case study of female academic managers in an Australian regional university. Advancing women in leadership journal, 21.

Cite this Article: