The Moderating Roles of Price Consciousness, Product Knowledge, and Product Type in the Reference Price Advertisement Effect

Author(s)

Yuan-Shuh Lii , Chin-Sheng Yang ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 15-21 | Views: 697 | Downloads: 210 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3702214

Volume 9 - February 2020 (02)

Abstract

Most academic research has found that an advertised reference price (ARP) has a significant and positive effect on consumers’ price perceptions and purchase intentions. However, the ARP effect may not be independent of individual differences and product types. The study presents empirical evidence on the effect of ARP on consumers’ price judgments as well as on the moderating effects of price consciousness, product knowledge, and product type. Using a 2 x 2 factorial design experiment, the results indicate that an ARP (both plausible and implausible) exerts a significant and positive effect on consumers’ price judgments.  However, no significant effect was found for the three moderating variables

Keywords

Price Consciousness, Product Knowledge, Product Type

References

i.            Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411-454.

ii.          Alford, B and Biswas, A (2002). The Effects of Discount Level, Price Consciousness and Sale Proneness on Consumers' Price Perception and Behavioral Intention. Journal of Business Research, 55(9): 775-783

iii.        Bozkurt, S., & Gligor, D. (2019). Customers’ behavioral responses to unfavorable pricing errors: the role of perceived deception, dissatisfaction and price consciousness. Journal of Consumer Marketing.

iv.         Biswas, A. (1992). The moderating role of brand familiarity in reference price perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 25(3), 251-262.

v.           Biswas, A., & Blair, E. A. (1991). Contextual effects of reference prices in retail advertisements. Journal of Marketing, 55(3), 1-12.

vi.         Blair, E. A., & Landon Jr, E. L. (1981). The effects of reference prices in retail advertisements. Journal of Marketing, 45(2), 61-69.

vii.       Chandrashekaran, R. (2001). The implications of individual differences in reference price utilization for designing effective price communications. Journal of Business Research, 53(2), 85-91.

viii.     Choi, C., & Mattila, A. S. (2018). The effects of internal and external reference prices on travelers’ price evaluations. Journal of Travel Research, 57(8), 1068-1077.

ix.         Compeau, L. D., & Grewal, D. (1998). Comparative price advertising: an integrative review. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 257-273.

x.           Frankenberger, K. D. and Liu, R. (1994). Does Consumer Knowledge Affect Consumer Responses to Advertised Reference Price Claims? Psychology and Marketing, 11(3): 235-251.

xi.         Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46-59.

xii.       Herr, P. M. (1989). Priming price: Prior knowledge and context effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 67-75.

xiii.     Hoyer, W. D. (1984). An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), 822-829.

xiv.     Johnson, E. and Russo, J. E. (1984). Product Familiarity and Learning New Information. Journal of Consumer Research, 11: (June). 542-550.

xv.       Kalwani, M. U., Yim, C. K., Rinne, H. J., and Yoshi Sugita. (1990). A Price Expectations Model of Customer Brand Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, XXVII:251-262.

xvi.     Kan, C., Lichtenstein, D. R., Grant, S. J., & Janiszewski, C. (2014). Strengthening the influence of advertised reference prices through information priming. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1078-1096.

xvii.   Khurram, M., & Sheeraz, M. (2018). The Role of Brand Recall, Brand Recognition and Price Consciousness in Understanding Actual Purchase. Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(2), 219-241.

xviii. Kim, B. D., & Rossi, P. E. (1994). Purchase frequency, sample selection, and price sensitivity: The heavy-user bias. Marketing Letters, 5(1), 57-67.

xix.     Klein, N. H., & Oglethorpe, J. E. (1987). Cognitive reference points in consumer decision making. ACR North American Advances, 14, 183-187

xx.       Lee, D. H., & Olshavsky, R. W. (1997). Consumers' use of alternative information sources in inference generation: A replication study. Journal of Business Research, 39(3), 257-269.

xxi.     Lichtenstein, D. R., & Bearden, W. O. (1989). Contextual influences on perceptions of merchant-supplied reference prices. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 55-66.

xxii.   Liefeld, J., & Heslop, L. A. (1985). Reference prices and deception in newspaper advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 868-876.

xxiii. Lin, L. Y., & Chen, C. S. (2006). The influence of the countryoforigin image, product knowledge and product involvement on consumer purchase decisions: an empirical study of insurance and catering services in Taiwan. Journal of consumer Marketing.

xxiv.  Lynch Jr, J. G., & Srull, T. K. (1982). Memory and attentional factors in consumer choice: Concepts and research methods. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 18-37.

xxv.    Mazumdar, T., Raji, S. P., and Sinha, I. (2005). Reference price research: Review and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 84-102.

xxvi.  McKechnie, S., Devlin, J., Ennew, C., & Smith, A. (2012). Effects of discount framing in comparative price advertising. European Journal of Marketing.

xxvii.        Monroe, K. B. (1973). Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. Journal of Marketing research, 10(1), 70-80.

xxviii.      Monroe, K. B., & Petroshius, S. M. (1981). Buyers' perceptions of price: An update of the evidence. Perspectives in Consumer Behavior, 3(23), 42.

xxix.  Monroe, K. B., & Chapman, J. D. (1987). Framing effects on buyers' subjective product evaluations. ACR North American Advances. 14, 193-197

xxx.    Monroe, K. (1990). Pricing: making profitable decisions. New York, NA: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

xxxi.  Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 87-131.

xxxii.        Rajendran, K. N., & Tellis, G. J. (1994). Contextual and temporal components of reference price. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 22-34.

xxxiii.      Rao, A. R., & Sieben, W. A. (1992). The effect of prior knowledge on price acceptability and the type of information examined. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 256-270.

xxxiv.      Robertson, J., Ferreira, C., & Botha, E. (2018). The influence of product knowledge on the relative importance of extrinsic product attributes of wine. Journal of wine research, 29(3), 159-176.

xxxv.Roy, R., Rabbanee, F. K., & Sharma, P. (2016). Exploring the interactions among external reference price, social visibility and purchase motivation in pay-what-you-want pricing. European Journal of Marketing.

xxxvi.      Saint Clair, J. K., Hamilton, M. L., Woodham, O. P., Namin, A., & Bennett, D. H. (2019). Is it Expensive? The Dual Effect of Construal Level on Price Judgments. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 27(3), 298-311.

xxxvii.    Sinha, R.K. and Adhikari, A. (2017). Advertised reference price and sales price as anchors of the latitude of expected price and its impact on purchase intention. European Journal of Marketing, 51(9/10), 1597-1611.

xxxviii.  Stanton, J. V., & Cook, L. A. (2019). Product knowledge and information processing of organic foods. Journal of Consumer Marketing.

xxxix.      Urbany, J. E., & Dickson, P. R. (1991). Consumer normal price estimation: market versus personal standards. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 45-51.

xl.         Urbany, J. E., Bearden, W. O., & Weilbaker, D. C. (1988). The effect of plausible and exaggerated reference prices on consumer perceptions and price search. Journal of Consumer research, 15(1), 95-110.

xli.       Vaidyanathan, R., & Aggarwal, P. (2020). Does MSRP impact women differently? Exploring gender-based differences in the effectiveness of retailer-provided reference prices. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102049.

xlii.     Velikova, N., Howell, R. D., & Dodd, T. (2015). The development of an objective wine knowledge scale: the item response theory approach. International Journal of Wine Business Research.

Cite this Article: