Corporate Environmental Disclosures and the Cost of Equity Capital: Evidence from the High-Polluting Chinese Listed Firms

Author(s)

Minghan Lyu , Guanghua Xu , Yi Shen ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 67-78 | Views: 739 | Downloads: 198 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3702224

Volume 9 - February 2020 (02)

Abstract

As global environmental pollution increases, it has great significance to explore the economic value relevance of environmental disclosure of the polluting firms, especially in emerging markets such as China. From the perspective of the capital market, we explore whether corporate environmental disclosure will reduce the cost of equity capital based on the sample data of Chinese listed companies in the most polluting industries. We find that environmental disclosure can reduce information asymmetry, help companies build a good image, obtain stronger legitimacy and identity, and ultimately reduce investors' risk-reward requirements. Further, we also find that due to differences in information determination, exposure levels, and investor demand, the negative impact of corporate environmental disclosure on the cost of equity capital will be stronger when a company has a high monopoly power or the industry is highly competitive. The conclusions of this study help to enhance the understanding of the economic consequences of corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets, enrich research results in related fields and promote polluting companies to more actively improve the quality of environmental disclosure.

Keywords

environmental disclosure; the cost of equity capital; corporate monopoly power; industry competition

References

i.        Aerts, W., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2008). Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective. Ecological economics, 64(3), 643-659.

ii.      Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.

iii.    Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8), 639-647.

iv.     Clarkson, P. M., Fang, X., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. (2013). The relevance of environmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(5), 410-431.

v.       Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303-327.

vi.     Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2015). The Economic Relevance of Environmental Disclosure and its Impact on Corporate Legitimacy: An Empirical Investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 431-450.

vii.   Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.

viii. Easton, P. D. (2004). PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The accounting review, 79(1), 73-95.

ix.     Hea, Y., Tangb, Q., & Wanga, K. (2013). Carbon disclosure, carbon performance, and cost of capital. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 1, 190-220.

x.       Irvine, P. J., & Pontiff, J. (2009). Idiosyncratic return volatility, cash flows, and product market competition. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(3), 1149-1177.

xi.     Lorraine, N. H. J., Collison, D. J., & Power, D. M. (2004). An analysis of the stock market impact of environmental performance information. Accounting Forum, 28(1), 7-26.

xii.   Merton, R. C. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. The journal of finance, 42(3), 483-510.

xiii. Ohlson, J. A., & Juettner-Nauroth, B. E. (2005). Expected EPS and EPS growth as determinants of value. Review of accounting studies, 10(2-3), 349-365.

xiv. Pigou, A. (2017). The economics of welfare: Routledge.

xv.   Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of accounting and public policy, 34(4), 336-361.

xvi. Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102-116.

Cite this Article: