Feasibility Analysis of Broiler Farm with Partnership Pattern

Author(s)

Saiful Amin , Agustin HP ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 01-11 | Views: 845 | Downloads: 287 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4922614

Volume 9 - April 2020 (04)

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the potential for sustainability of broiler farms in terms of investment feasibility. The identification of techno-economic feasibility used four investment criteria namely Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Benefit-Cost Ratio (B / C), and Payback Period (PP). The population in this study were breeders in Jember Regency who used herbal ingredients as a substitution for antibiotic growth promoter drugs in their business activities. The number of samples was 4 respondents selected based on purposive sampling technique. The results showed that there was negative (-) NPV value on 1 breeder that was equal to Rp 562,878, while the NPV values on 3 other breeders were positive with the value Rp11,429,098; Rp.3,410,492; and Rp6,931,781. The IRR values ​​were 38%, 26.52%, and 28.41%, respectively, more than the expected profit of 25%. Each PI values were 1.38; 1.06 and 1.12. It indicated a number greater than 1, which means that investment in the broiler farm business was worth doing. The analysis also showed that the payback period was the fastest return in a period of 1 period 49 days or 109 days, and at the most 4 periods 13 days or 253 days. This showed the broiler farm business was considered feasible to be carried out due to the faster payback period than the economic life of the investment, which is 5 years.

Keywords

Investment Ability, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Profitability Index, Pay Back Period

References

                    i.            Ali, I. (1986). Public investment criteria Economic internal rate of return and equalizing discount rate. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

      ii.            Anthony, F. J. O., Baker, K. B., Miller, D. J. S., Young, R. C., & Baird, J. H. (2003). Antibiotic growth promoters [4]. Veterinary Record, Vol. 153, p. 408.

    iii.            Azizah, N., Utami, H. D., & Nugroho, B. A. (2013). Analisis Pola Kemitraan Usaha Peternakan Ayam Pedaging Sistem closed house di Plandan Kabupaten Jombang. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 23(2), 1–3.

     iv.            Biro Perencanaan Kementan. (2014). Kebijakan pembangunan pertanian 2015 - 2019. Workshop Aplikasi E-Proposal 2015 Dan e-Monev 2014 Indonesia Wilayah Barat, 1–40.

       v.            Chevalier, A., & Prasetyantoko, A. I. T. (2008). Foreign Ownership, Firm Value and Currency Depreciation: Evidence from Indonesia (presented in Knowledge Development and Exchange in International Business Networks. Milan, Itali, June 3-Juli 3, 2008). Milan: Academy of International Business.

     vi.            Cleary, M. (2019). Analisis Usaha Peternakan Ayam Broiler Pola Kemitraan (Studi Kasus Peternak Plasma PT. Bilabong di Kecamatan Limpung Kabupaten Batang). Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

   vii.            Dirjen PKH. (2016). Renstra_Ditjen_PKH_(2015-2019)_Rev_II.pdf (p. 77). p. 77.

 viii.            Djatmiko, H. E., & Armadi. (2012). Bersenjatakan GCG, Menjaring Investasi. SWA, 28(27), 30–31.

     ix.            Effendi, R. (2001). KAJIAN TEKNO-EKONOMI INDUSTRI MDF ( Medium Density Fiberboard ). Info Sosial Ekonomi, 2(2), 103–112.

       x.            Haryoko, U. B. (2017). Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Mobil Di Ujm Motor Tangerang Selatan. (5), 1–81.

     xi.            Jaelani, A., Suslinawati, & Maslan. (2013). Analisis kelayakan Usaha Peternakan Ayam Broiler Di Kecamatan Tapin Utara Kabupaten Tapin. Jurnal Ilmu TernakIlmu Ternak, 13(2), 42–48.

   xii.            Jember, B. (2017). Kabupaten Jember Dalam Angka. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Jember.

 xiii.            Jember, D. I. K. (2012). Kajian sosial ekonomi beternak ayam pedaging di kabupaten jember.

 xiv.            Maulana, Y., Mauludin, Y., & Gunadhi, E. (2014). Analisis Usaha Peternakan Ayam Ras Pedaging (Broiler) Dengan Pola Kemitraan (Studi Kasus Di Peternakan Bu Lilis Rancamidin, Cibodas). Jurnal Kalibrasi, 12(1), 66. Retrieved from http://jurnal.sttgarut.ac.id/index.php/kalibrasi/article/view/275

   xv.            Pujotomo, Y. F. F. D. (2016). Analisis Kelayakan Investasi Peternakan Ayam Broiler Dengan Pola Kemitraan (Studi Kasus di CV. MUSTIKA Semarang). Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/189274-ID-analisis-kelayakan-investasi-peternakan.pdf

 xvi.            Ringo, A. S. (2016). Studi kelayakan finansial usaha peternakan ayam ras dengan pola kemitraan di kecamatan rambah hilir kabupaten rokan hulu.

xvii.            Rkp, P. P., Perencanaan, M., Nasional, P., & Holistik, P. P. (2017). TEMA , ARAH KEBIJAKAN , DAN.

xviii.            Suryabrata, S. (2003). Metode Pene-litian. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 21–26.

 xix.            Suwinggadana, A, I. P., Suciani, & Sariani, N. P. (2013). Analisis Finansial Usaha Peternakan Ayam Pedaging Dengan Pola Kemitraan. Jurnal Peternakan Tropica, 378, 310–323.

   xx.            Widjayanti, F. N. and M. R. (2016). Sistem kemitraan dalam usaha tani peternakan ayam broiler di Kabupaten Jember. Surya Agritama, 5(1), 110–129. Retrieved from http://ejournal.umpwr.ac.id/index.php/surya-agritama/article/view/3101/3275

Cite this Article: