The Role of Motivation on Institutional Development: Selecting the Appropriate Theory for Milton Margai College of Education and Technology
Author(s)
Adikali Kaba Sesay , Javed Ali Soomro , Bassiratu Ballay Mansaray , Abdul Amid Aziz Jalloh , Alpha Bassie Mansaray ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 56-66 | Views: 1369 | Downloads: 374 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3473827
Abstract
An administrator’s duties in today’s corporate world are diversified. Not only do managers need to be versed in finance, economics, and information systems; it is now essential for them to have a firm grasp on organizational behavior and psychology. They must know how their employees think and what makes them think that way. Meeting the demands of this work prompted the researchers to seek secondary data to be able to bring to light the concept of motivation. It also led the researchers into looking for appropriate materials on the type of motivation. The research gives us a faster glimpse on the types of motivation (Intrinsic rewards are those which are felt directly, and include accomplishment, increased self-esteem, and new skills; extrinsic rewards are provided by an outside agent and include bonuses, praise, and promotions). The theories were also looked into, and their relevance brought out as to how they will help the institution. At the end of this research work, it is believed to help develop the institution by improving on employees’ performance for the achievement of the institution’s goal.
Keywords
Motivation, theories, goal-setting, Milton Margai, implication.
References
i. Adams, JS (1965) Injustice in social exchange, in (ed) L Berkowitz, Advances in Experimental Psychology, Academic Press, New York.
ii. Allport, G (1954) The historical background of modern social psychology, in (ed) G Lindzey, Theoretical Models and Personality, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA
iii. Carell M R and Dittrich, J E (1978) Equity theory: the recent literature, methodological consideration and new direction, Academy of Management Review, 3 (2), pp 201-210.
iv. Deci, E L and Ryan, R M (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behaviour, Plenum, New York.
v. Guest, D E (1992) Motivation after Herzberg, Unpublished paper delivered at the Compensation Forum, London
vi. Hackman, J R and Oldham, G R (1974) Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory, Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 16 (2), pp 250–79
vii. H. Maslow, “Theory of Human Motivation,” Psychological Reports 50 (1943), 370–396.
viii. Herzberg, F (1968) One more time: how do you motivate employees?, Harvard Business Review, January- February, pp 109–20
ix. Hull, C (1951) Essentials of Behaviour, Yale University Press, New Haven CT
x. Hunter, J E, Schmidt, F L and Judiesch, M K (1990) Individual differences in output variability as a function of job complexity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (1), pp 28–42
xi. Katz, D (1964) The motivational basis of organizational behaviour, Behavioural Science, 9, pp 131–36
xii. Kohn, A (1993) Why incentive plans cannot work, Harvard Business Review, September–October, pp 54–63
xiii. Maslow, A (1954) Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row, New York
xiv. McGregor, D (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise, McGraw-Hill, New York
xv. Porter, L W and Lawler, E E (1968) Managerial Attitudes and Performance, Irwin-Dorsey, Homewood, IL
xvi. Robertson, I T and Cooper, C L (1983) Human Behaviour in Organizations, Macdonald & Evans,
xvii. Taylor, F W (1911) Principles of Scientifi c Management, Harper, New York
xviii. Vroom, V (1964) Work and Motivation, Wiley, New York
xix. Wahba, M A and Bridwell, L G (1979) Maslow reconsidered: a review of research on the need hierarchy theory, in (eds) R M Sters and L W Porter, Motivation and Work Behaviour, McGraw Hill, New York
Cite this Article: