The Impact of Achievement Orientation Type on Intrinsic Motivation and Quality Performance of Millennials Employees

Author(s)

Ibtisam S. Al-Sa’afeen , Prof. Mohamad Shehada ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 43-54 | Views: 698 | Downloads: 188 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4933387

Volume 9 - May 2020 (05)

Abstract

This study intended to find the impact of achievement orientation types on intrinsic motivation and quality performance of millennials employees at Electronic Health Solution (EHS), Mawdoo3.com, Amman Drug and Trading Company Ltd (ADATCO), and Zein Group (ZGT). Furthermore, the study will analyze mastery goal-focused orientation and performance goal-focused orientation as two independent forms of achievement orientation mentalities or, alternatively, as two opposite poles of a continuum ranging from a poor (performance-focused) to a good (mastery-focused) forms of achievement orientations. 102 experts from millennium ages (23-38), were deployed in building the survey that is going to be shared and filled up by our targeted sample, in order to classify their own achievement orientation and measure its impact on their Intrinsic Motivation (IM) and performance at their current jobs. Zero-order correlations and Hierarchical multiple regression were used in assessing data, measuring results, and results interpretations. Results supported the positive Impact of Mastery Orientation goal on employees achievements as it was associated to higher intrinsic motivation and performance, a negative relationship emerged between avoidance goal orientations and employee’s intrinsic motivation and quality performance, and more negative with mastery avoidance goal

Keywords

Achievement Orientation Type, Intrinsic Motivation, Quality Performance, Millennium Employees, Strategic Goals Achievement, Mastery Goal Focused, Mastery Avoidance Focused

References

                    i.            Ames, Carole, (1984), "Achievement attributions and self-instructions under competitive and individualistic goal structures", Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (3): 478–487. 

      ii.            Blackwell, Lisa S, et.al, (2007),"Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement Across an Adolescent Transition: A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention", Child Development, 78 (1):246–263.

    iii.            Butler, R. et.al, (1987), "Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance", Journal of Educational Psychology. 79 (4): 474–482.

     iv.            Cimpian, A., et.al (2007), "Subtle Linguistic Cues Affect Children's Motivation", Psychological Science, 18 (4): 314–316. 

       v.            Daniels, L., et.al (2008), “Individual differences in achievement goal: A longitudinal study of cognitive, emotional, and achievement outcomes”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33: 584- 608.

     vi.            Diener, C., et.al (1978), "An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 (5): 451–462.

   vii.            Diener, D., Dweck, D, et.al (1980), An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 940-952.

 viii.            Dweck, C. (2007), "The perils and promises of praise", Educational Leadership,  65 (2): 34–39.

     ix.            Dweck, C. (2010), "Even geniuses work hard",  Educational Leadership,  68 (1): 16–20.

       x.            Dweck, C. (1986), "Motivational processes affecting learning", American Psychologist, 41 (10): 1040–1048.

     xi.            Eccles, J., et.al (1993), "Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families", American Psychologist, 48 (2): 90–101. 

   xii.            Elliot, A., K. Murayama, et.al (2008), “On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (3): 613-628

 xiii.            Elliott, E., Dweck, C, et.al (1988), Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12.

 xiv.            Elliott, E., Dweck, C., et.al (1988), "Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (1): 5–12. 

   xv.            Hattie, J., et.al (2007), "The Power of Feedback", Review of Educational Research, 77 (1): 81–112. 

 xvi.            Henderlong, J., et.al (2002), "The effects of praise on children's intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis", Psychological Bulletin, 128 (5): 774–795. 

xvii.            Hidi, S., et.al (2000), “Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century”, Review of Educational Research, 70: 151-179.

xviii.            Hyde, J., et.al (1990), "Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis", Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2): 139–155.

 xix.            Kamins, M., Dweck, C., et.al (1999), "Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping" Developmental Psychology, 35 (3): 835–847. 

   xx.            Leondari, A., et.al (2002), "Implicit Theories, Goal Orientations, and Perceived Competence: Impact on Employees' Achievement Behavior", Psychology in the Schools, 39 (3): 279–291. 

 xxi.            McClelland, D. (1961), “The Achieving Society”, Free Press, New York.

xxii.            McClelland, D., Winter, D., et.al (1969), “Motivating Economic Achievement”. New York: Free Press.

xxiii.            Meece, J. (1993), "A Pattern Analysis of Employees' Achievement Goals",Journal of Educational Psychology. 85 (4): 582–590.

xxiv.            Midgley, C., et.al (1995), "Differences between Elementary and Middle School Teachers and Employees: A Goal Theory Approach", The Journal of Early Adolescence, 15 (1): 90–113. 

xxv.            Mueller, C., et.al (1998), "Praise for Intelligence can undermine Children's Motivation and Performance", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (1): 33–52. 

xxvi.            Murray, H. A. (1938), p164. Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford University Press

xxvii.            Nicholls, John G.; Miller, Arden T. (1983), "The Differentiation of the Concepts of Difficulty and Ability", Child Development, 54 (4).

xxviii.            Ormrod, J., (2012), “Human learning”, Upper Saddle River”, NJ: Pearson, 6th ed.

xxix.            Pomerantz, E., et.al (2013), "Mothers' Daily Person and Process Praise: Implications for Children's Theory of Intelligence and Motivation", Developmental Psychology, 49 (11): 2040–2046. 

xxx.            Pearson, S. (2002), "Performance goals: The Moderating Roles of Context and Achievement Orientation", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (6): 603–610. 

xxxi.            Schunk, D. (2012), “ Learning theories: An educational perspective”, Boston, 6th ed.

xxxii.            Vandewalle, D. (1997), “Development and Validation of a Work Domain Goal Orientation Instrument”,  Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57 (6), 995-1015. 101

xxxiii.            Vandewalle, D., et.al (1999), The influence of goal orientation and self-regulation tactics on sales performance: A longitudinal study”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (2), 249-259.

xxxiv.            Vandewalle, D. Cron, W., and Slocum, J. (2001), The role of goal orientation following performance feedback”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 629-640.

xxxv.            Wigfield, A. (2010), "Employees' Achievement Values, Goal Orientations, and Interest: Definitions, Development, and Relations to Achievement Outcomes", Developmental Review, 30 (1): 1–35. 

xxxvi.            Zimmerman, B. (2009), “Motives to self-regulate learning: A social cognitive account”. In: Wentzel, K.R. and A. Wigfield , “Handbook of motivation at school”, New York, NY: Routledge.

Websites:

https://www.kornferry.com/institute/achievement-orientation

http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/

Cite this Article: