Effect of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance in Ghana
Author(s)
Agyemang Andrew Osei , Kong Yusheng , Ayamba Emmanuel Caesar , Oswin Aganda Anaba ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 108-118 | Views: 1303 | Downloads: 426 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3473849
Abstract
This research focuses on the measurement of the quality of corporate governance and on whether there exists a relationship between corporate governance and firm performance for a sample of the top 100 companies in Ghana. With reference to the battery of models available from the literature and the Code of Corporate Governance applicable to Ghana, a checklist measuring the effect of 13 key factors was developed and studied in relation to the Taffler model. Analysis from the results shows that on the overall, there is no difference in performance for companies having poor and excellent quality of governance. Hence no significant relationship has been found between corporate governance and financial performance.
Keywords
Corporate Governance, Firm performance, Top 100 companies, Ghana
References
i. Agrawal, A., and C. R. Knoeber. (1996). Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377–397.
ii. Bauer, R., Guenster, N., Otten, R. (2004). Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe: the effect on stocks returns, firm value and performance, Journal of Asset Management, Vol. 5 No.2, pp.91-104.
iii. Black, B. (2001). The Corporate governance behaviour and market value of Russian firms, Emerging Markets Review, Vol. 2.
iv. Bosch, H. (1995). The Director at Risk: Accountability in the Boardroom., Pitman Publishing, Melbourne.
v. Brown, L.D., Caylor, M.L. (2004). The Correlation Between Corporate Governance and Company Performance, research study commissioned by Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc.
vi. Campos, C.E., Newell, R.E., Wilson, G. (2002). Corporate governance develops in emerging markets, McKinsey on Finance, No.3, pp.15-18.
vii. Conyon M J and Schwalbach J. (2000). Executive Compensation: Evidence from the UK and Germany, Long Range Planning), Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 504-526.
viii. Daily, Catherine M. & Dalton, Dan R. (1992). The relationship between governance structure and corporate performance in entrepreneurial firms, Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 375-386, September.
ix. Donaldson, L. (1990). The Ethereal Hand: Organizational Economics and Management Theory, Academy of Management Review, 15: 369–381.
x. Drobetz, W., Schillhofer, A., Zimmerman, H. (2004). .Corporate governance and expected stock returns: evidence from Germany, European Financial Management, Vol. 10 No.2, pp.267-93.
xi. Duffhues P and Kabir R. (2008). Is the Pay-Performance Relationship Always Positive?:
xii. Evidence from the Netherlands, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 45-60.
xiii. Francis, I. (1997). Future Direction: The Power of the Competitive Board, Melbourne,
xiv. FT Pitman Publishing, Australia.
xv. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C. and Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and ‘The Corporate Objective Revisited, Organization Science, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 364-369.
xvi. Gompers, Paul A., and Andrew Metrick. (2001). Institutional Investors and Equity Prices, Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXIV, 229–260.
xvii. Haniffa R and Hudaib M. (2006). Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of
xviii. Malaysian Listed Companies, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 33, No. 7- 8, pp. 1034-1062.
xix. Harris, Milton and Raviv, Artur. (2008). A Theory of Board Control and Size, The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 21, Issue 4, pp. 1797-1832, 2008.
xx. Healey, J. (2003a). Corporate Governance and Wealth Creation in New Zealand Palmerston North, Dunmore Press Ltd, New Zealand.
xxi. Hilmer, F.G. (1993). Strictly Boardroom: Improving Governance to Enhance Company Performance, The Business Library, Melbourne.
xxii. Ho C-K. (2005). Corporate Governance and Corporate Competitiveness: an international
xxiii. analysis, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 211-253.
xxiv. Jensen, M. and W. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the firm: Management behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4), 305-360.
xxv. John, K., and L. W. Senbet. (1998) .Corporate governance and board effectiveness, Journal of Banking & Finance 22 (May), pp. 371-403.
xxvi. Klapper, Leora F. & Love, Inessa. (2002). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 2818.
xxvii. Larcker, D. F., S. A. Richardson, and I. Tuna. (2007). Corporate Governance and Accounting Outcomes, The Accounting Review, Vol. 83, No. 4.
xxviii. Loh, L.C. (2002). Gains from increased voluntary disclosure in corporate reporting, The Star Biz Weekly, Vol. 3.
xxix. Mahadeo, J D and Soobaroyen. (2009). Implementation and Impact of Corporate Governance” Mauritius Research Council.
xxx. Nicholson, G. J. and G. C. Kiel. (2003b). A framework for diagnosing board effectiveness, 6th International Conference on Corporate Governance and Board Leadership, Henley Management College.
xxxi. Park, Y.W., Shin, H. (2004). Board composition and earnings management in Canada, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 10 No.3, pp.431-57.
xxxii. Parum E. (2005). Does Disclosure on Corporate Governance Lead to Openness and Transparency in How Companies are Managed?, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 702-709.
xxxiii. Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 2, 218–228.
xxxiv. Prevost, A.K., Rao, R.P., Hossain, M. (2002), “Determinants of board composition in New Zealand: a simultaneous equations approach”, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 9 No.4, pp.373-97.
xxxv. Rechner P L and Dalton D R. (1991) .CEO Duality and Organizational Performance: A
xxxvi. Longitudinal Analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 155-160.
xxxvii. Roche J. (2005), Corporate Governance in Asia, Routledge, Oxon.
xxxviii. Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., and Keller, H. (2006) Board Characteristics and Involvement in Strategic Decision Making: Evidence from Swiss Companies, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43 (5),1201-1226.
xxxix. Schmidt, Reinhard H., Tyrell Marcel. (1997). Financial Systems, Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance, European Financial Management, Vol. 3, pp. 159 - 187.
xl. Selvaggi, M and Upton, J. (2008). Governance and Performance in Corporate Britain: Evidence from the IVIS colour rating system, ABI Research Paper 7, Report from ABI Research and Investment Affairs Department, February.
xli. Solomon J and Solomon A (2004). Corporate Governance and Accountability, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex.
xlii. Taffler, R.J. (1977). Finding those companies in danger using discriminant analysis and financial ratio data: a comparative based study city business school, City University Business School, London, Working Paper No. 3.
xliii. The HIH Royal Commission (2003). The Failure of HIH Insurance: Volume I, A corporate collapse and its lessons, Commonwealth of Australia.
Cite this Article: