Training Assessment of Intellectual Property in Vietnam

Author(s)

Ngoc Toan Nguyen ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 109-117 | Views: 628 | Downloads: 192 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4922886

Volume 9 - April 2020 (04)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to assess the status of training, valuation, intellectual property in Vietnam. Through analyzing the situation of the training course of valuation, valuation of intellectual property, the author makes remarks about the achievements, the limitations that need to be overcome, and analysis of the causes. Lead to restrictions. Finally, the author makes recommendations to improve the efficiency of IP asset valuation training

Keywords

Training, valuation, intellectual property, Vietnam.

References

        i.            Intellectual Property Law 2005

      ii.            The Intellectual Property Law was amended in 2009

    iii.            Technology transfer law 2006;

     iv.            Personal income tax Law;

       v.            Vietnam price appraisal standard system

     vi.            TRIPS Agreement

   vii.            Nguyen Van Anh, Le Vu Toan, Organization model of international technology transfer promotion and lessons learned for Vietnam, Journal of Scientific Activities, February 2011

 viii.            Nguyen Van Anh, Nguyen Bao Hung, Le Vu Toan, Technology Protection in Vietnam: Some issues that enterprises need to know, Science Activities Review, June 2012

     ix.            Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tran Van Nam; Faculty of Law, National Economics University "Current status of capital contribution with intellectual property of Vietnamese enterprises today"

       x.            Nguyen Huu Can, Institute of Intellectual Property Science: "Theoretical and practical research to develop an invention valuation method applicable to Vietnam", 2009

     xi.            Report on valuation of Viglacera brand market, Favi Valuation Company, January 2003

   xii.            Capital asset pricing model (CAPM), Fullbright economic curriculum, 2006-2007; Lecture 6 - Financial analysis

 xiii.            Estimated discount rate, Fullbright economics curriculum for the 2011-2013 school year

 xiv.            Present value and opportunity cost of capital, Fullbright economics curriculum for the 2011-2013 school year

   xv.            Judgment No. 275/2006 / DS-ST of March 29, 2006, of the Civil Court of Ho Chi Minh City People's Court Ho Chi Minh

 xvi.            Overview of international valuation on trademarks, Dr. Pham Hong Quat, Intellectual Property Department, Workshop “Legal regulations and practices of intellectual property valuation in enterprises for equitization and dispute resolution"; Ministry of Justice, September 2009

xvii.            Some issues about trademark valuation - Dao Minh Duc, Head of Intellectual Property Department, Ho Chi Minh City Department of Science and Technology

xviii.            Nguyen Dang Dau and Nguyen Xuan Tai, "Technology Management Curriculum", National Economics University.

 xix.            Workshop paper "Valuation of intellectual property", Hanoi, June 5 - 7, 2013

   xx.            Student Handbook, Valuation of Intellectual Property, Modul 4, Pro Inno Europe (2007)

 xxi.            Chang-Man Im "Evaluation and technology transfer in Korea" Korea technology transfer CenterGrünewald, Dr.rer.nat, Alexander Wurzer, “Reasons for Patent Valuation”, 4/2007

xxii.            Ankur Singla, “Valuation of Intellectual Property”, 2007

xxiii.            Dr. John Turner, “Valuation of Intellectual Property Assets: Valuation Techniques, Parameters, Methodologies and Limitations”, 11/2000

xxiv.            Dictionary of marketing terms, 2nd Edition, NTC Business Book, 1996

xxv.            David A. Weinstein “Trade naeme means any name a business uses to identify itself”

xxvi.            Matthew Gream: Trademark valuation: review in January 2004

Cite this Article: