Academic Facility Availability and Influence on Students Academic Performance and Enrollment: Moderating and Mediating Effects of Facility Maintenance
Author(s)
Pearl Abredu , Yinghua Chen , Edwina Naa Amerley Amarteifio , Frank Kofi Essien ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 217-226 | Views: 582 | Downloads: 189 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4933799
Abstract
Many studies have assessed the influence of a diversity of factors on the academic performance of students but not much can be found on the effects of academic facility availability and functionality on performance and enrollment. In this study, the influence of academic facility availability (AFA) on academic performance (AP) and enrollment of students (E) and the potential mediation and moderating effects of facility maintenance (FM) are studied. A cross-sectional survey, quantitative design was followed and data was assessed using IBM-SPSS (version 25). Multivariate regression analysis was performed after data fitness and collinearity checks were performed. Models were significant for AP and E with R2 values being 0.8990 and 0.7210 respectively at P < 0.05. It was observed that a unit increase in the availability of functional academic facilities in educational institutions in Ghana has the potential to enhance the academic performance of students by about 69.00%, holding all other factors constant. Also, to a significant but lesser degree, the maintenance of existing facilities (FM), when improved by a unit has the potential to also enhance AP by about 41.00%. Further assessment indicated that a unit improvement in AFA in educational institutions had the potential to increase enrollment by about 70.00%, whereas the maintenance of such facilities would only enhance E by 21.00%, ceteris paribus. The PROCESS macro extension was used to test mediation and moderation functions of FM in this study. FM mediated significantly the relationship between AFA and AP (r2 = 0.7190) but could not mediate that between AFA and E (r2 = 0.0893). A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted to test the moderating effects of FM on the relationship between AFA and AP or E. FM was found to significantly moderated the relationships between AFA and AP/E (P < 0.05)
Keywords
Academic facilities; maintenance; mediation; moderation; academic performance; student enrollment.
References
i. Abdallah, T. (2017). Chapter 2 - Infrastructure, Facilities and Vehicles. Sustainable Mass Transit- Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Public Transportation, pp. 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811299-1.00002-2.
ii. Alma, B., Coşkun, E., Övendireli, E. (2016). University Ranking Systems and Proposal of a Theoretical Framework for Ranking of Turkish Universities: A Case of Management Departments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.008.
iii. Beder, H. (1981). Strengthening public school support for continuing education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1981(9), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719810910.
iv. Dickerson, D.E., & Ackerman, P.J. (2016). Risk-based Maintenance Management of U.S. Public School Facilities. Procedia Engineering, 145, 685-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.069.
v. Fareo, D.O., & Ojo, O.O. (2013). Impact of facilities on academic performance of students with special needs in mainstreamed public schools in Southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 13(2), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01228.x.
vi. Filippi, M., & Sirombo, E. (2015). Green Rating of Existing School Facilities. Energy Procedia, 78, 3156-3161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.773.
vii. Flavin, P. (2019). State government public goods spending and citizens' quality of life. Social Science Research, 78, 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.11.004.
viii. Hasbullah, A., Yusoff, W.Z.W., Ismail, M., & Vitasari, P. (2011). A framework study of school facilities performance in public primary school of Batubara district in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3708-3712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.360.
ix. Hood, N.E., Colabianchi, N., Terry‐McElrath,E.M., O'Malley, P.M., & Johnston, L.D. (2014). Physical Activity Breaks and Facilities in US Secondary Schools. Journal of School Health, 84(11), 697-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12206.
x. Ibrahim, N.M., Osman, M.M., Bachok, S., & Mohamed, M.Z. (2016). Assessment on the Condition of School Facilities: Case Study of the Selected Public Schools in Gombak District. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 228-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.151.
xi. Izobo-Matins, O., Olotuah, A., Adeyemi, E., Ayo-Vaughan, K., & Odetunmibi, O.A. (2018). Survey dataset of building user-perceptions on the condition of public secondary school buildings in Ogun State Nigeria. Data in Brief, 19, 2224-2234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.108.
xii. Kanters, M.A., Bocarro, J.N., Filardo, M., Edwards, M.B., McKenzie, T.L., & Floyd, M.F. (2014). Shared Use of School Facilities with Community Organizations and Afterschool Physical Activity Program Participation: A Cost‐Benefit Assessment. Journal of School Health, 84(5), 302-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12148.
xiii. Leung, W.T.V., Tam, T.Y.T., Pan, W.C., Wu, C.D., & Spengler, J.D. (2019). How is environmental greenness related to students' academic performance in English and Mathematics? Landscape and Urban Planning, 181, 118-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.021.
xiv. Min, S., Yuan, Z., Wang, X., & Hou, L. (2019). Do peer effects influence the academic performance of rural students at private migrant schools in China? China Economic Review, 54, 418-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.02.004.
xv. Muñoz-Bullón, F., Sanchez-Bueno, M.J., Vos-Saz, A. (2017). The influence of sports participation on academic performance among students in higher education. Sport Management Review, 20(4), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2016.10.006.
xvi. Pearce, A.R. (2017). Sustainable Urban Facilities Management. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences-Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies, pp. 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10183-6.
xvii. Reddy, K.S., Xie, E., & Tang, Q. (2016). Higher education, high-impact research, and world university rankings: A case of India and comparison with China. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.09.004.
xviii. Sidorenko, T., & Gorbatova, T. (2015). Efficiency of Russian Education Through the Scale of World University Rankings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 464-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.555.
xix. Turner, L., Calvert, H.G., & Chaloupka, F.J. (2018). Barriers to Shared Use of Indoor and Outdoor Facilities at US Elementary Schools. Journal of School Health, 88(5), 379-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12621.
xx. Wu, J., Wei, X., Zhang, H., & Zhou, X. (2019). Elite schools, magnet classes, and academic performances: Regression-discontinuity evidence from China. China Economic Review, 55, 143-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.03.004.
Cite this Article: