Investigating the Effectiveness of Business Intelligence Systems A PLS-SEM Approach

Author(s)

Haitham Al Shibly ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 33-49 | Views: 627 | Downloads: 191 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4978963

Volume 9 - September 2020 (09)

Abstract

Business Intelligence Systems (BIS) adoption is considered a top priority for many organizations and the promises of BIS are rapidly attracting many others. However, not all BIS initiatives have been successful and previous research address the BIS effectiveness have been somewhat scarce. As such, this study seeks to contribute to the developing body of research into BIS effectiveness.
Based on a review of literature grounded on IS success theories, the study develops and empirically validated a comprehensive model of BIS effectiveness, the model suggests BIS effectiveness should be seen as a myriad of an actual benefits and achievements both organization and BIS users receive from using a particular BIS. Following this perspective, by integrating the TAM and The D&M success models, the study model consists of six constructs: information quality, system quality, decision quality, perceived usefulness, decision support satisfaction, and net benefit. The causal relationships among the constructs in the model tested with a field survey collected from 138 BIS users.
Based on the PLS-SEM, the results indicate that seven out of eight hypotheses were supported. Our results suggest the degree to which using the BIS would enhance end-user performance is an important factor affecting decision support satisfaction.  An increase in the information quality and system quality of the BIS leads to an increase in decision quality. Any net positive effect from BIS information and system characteristics will result in a positive significant impact on users’ perceived usefulness. An increase in decision support satisfaction leads to an increase in the perceived benefits organization and users get from using the BIS.

Keywords

Business Intelligence Systems; Business Intelligence Systems effectiveness; Partial least squares-structural equation modeling

References

                    i.            Acheampong, O., & Moyaid, S. A. (2016). An integrated model for determining business intelligence systems adoption and post-adoption benefits in the banking sector. Journal of Administrative and Business Studies2(2), 84-100.

                  ii.            Alshibly, H. H. (2006). Customer satisfaction and empowerment as the prerequisite for web-based electronic commerce systems success. The University of Newcastle.

                iii.            Alshibly, H. H. (2014). Evaluating E-HRM success: A Validation of the Information Systems Success Model. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 4(3), 107.

                 iv.            Alshibly, H. H. (2015). Investigating decision support system (DSS) success: a partial least squares structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 6(4), 56.

                   v.            Arefin, M. S., Hoque, M. R., & Bao, Y. (2015). The impact of business intelligence on organization’s effectiveness: an empirical study. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 17(3), 263-285.

                 vi.            Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi Travis, M., & Prasanna Venkatesan, V. (2014). A survey on recent research in business intelligence. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(6), 831-866.

               vii.            Bach, M. P., Čeljo, A., & Zoroja, J. (2016). Technology Acceptance Model for Business Intelligence Systems: Preliminary Research. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 995-1001.

             viii.            Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530-545.

                 ix.            Ballantine, J., Bonner, M., Levy, M., Martin, A., Munro, I., and Powell, P. L. (1996), .The 3-D Model of Information Systems Success: The Search for the Dependent Variable Continues. Information Resources Management Journal, 9 (4), 5-14.

                   x.            Bharati, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2004). An empirical investigation of decision-making satisfaction in web-based decision support systems. Decision support systems, 37(2), 187-197.

                 xi.            Caniëls, M. C., & Bakens, R. J. (2012). The effects of Project Management Information Systems on decision-making in a multi-project environment. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2), 162-175.

               xii.            Chin, W.W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods, and Application, EspositoVinzi, V.; Chin, W.W.; Henseler, J.; Wang, H. (Eds.).Springer. Germany. 2010. pp. 645-689

             xiii.            Davcik, N. S. (2014). The use and misuse of structural equation modeling in management research: A review and critique. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 11(1), 47-81.

             xiv.            Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-40.

               xv.            Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.

             xvi.            Delone, W. H. and Mclean, E. R. (2003). The Delone and Mclean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19 (4), 9-30.

           xvii.            Delone, W. H., and Mclean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3 (1), 60-93.

         xviii.            Delone, W. H., and Mclean, E. R. (2016). Information Systems Success Measurement.

             xix.            Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henriksen, H. Z., Myers, M. D., Bunker, D., & Srivastava, S. C. (2015). Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 143-157.

               xx.            Farhoomand, A. F., and Drury, D. H. (1996). Factors Influencing Electronic Data Interchange Success. DATA BASE, 27 (1), 45-57.

             xxi.            Farrokhi, V., & Pokoradi, L. (2012). The necessities for building a model to evaluate Business Intelligence projects-Literature Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.1643.

           xxii.            Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

         xxiii.            Foundations and Trends in Information Systems, 2(1), 1-16.

          xxiv.            Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008). Re-conceptualizing information system success: The IS-impact measurement model. Journal of the association for information systems, 9(7), 18.

            xxv.            Garrity, E. J., and Sanders, G. L. (1998). Dimensions of Information Systems Success.  In Information Systems Success Measurement, E. J. Garrity and G. L. (Eds.) Sanders, Eds. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

          xxvi.            Garson, G.(2016 ). Partial Least Squares: Regression and Structural Equation. Models. Statistical Associates Publishers.

        xxvii.            Ghazanfari, M. J. S. R. M., Jafari, M., & Rouhani, S. (2011). A tool to evaluate the business intelligence of enterprise systems. Scientia Iranica, 18(6), 1579-1590.

      xxviii.            Gonzales, R., & Wareham, J. (2019). Analysing the impact of a business intelligence system and new conceptualizations of system use. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science.

          xxix.            Grublješič, T., & Jaklič, J. (2015). Business intelligence acceptance: The prominence of organizational factors. Information Systems Management32(4), 299-315.

            xxx.            Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

          xxxi.            Hamilton, S. and Chervany, N. L. (1981). Evaluating Information System Effectiveness -- Part I: Comparing Evaluation Approaches. MIS Quarterly, 5 (3), 55- 69.

        xxxii.            Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.

      xxxiii.            Iffat, N., Chaudhry, S., Bilal, W. A., & Rabail, A. (2015). An empirical study on critical failure factors and business intelligence system failure at a pre-implementation phase in small and medium enterprises in Pakistan. Business and Economics Journal, 7(1), 1-7.

      xxxiv.            Iivari, J. (2005). An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success. ACM Sigmis Database, 36 (2), 8-27.

        xxxv.            Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). A taxonomy of antecedents of information systems success: variable analysis studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(2), 169–246.

      xxxvi.            Larson, D., & Chang, V. (2016). A review and future direction of agile, business intelligence, analytics and data science. International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), 700-710.

    xxxvii.            Li, X., Hsieh, J. P. A., & Rai, A. (2013). Motivational differences across post-acceptance information system usage behaviors: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context. Information systems research, 24(3), 659-682.

  xxxviii.            Mudzana, T., & Maharaj, M. (2015). Measuring the success of business-intelligence systems in South Africa: An empirical investigation applying the DeLone and McLean Model. South African Journal of Information Management, 17(1), 1-7.

      xxxix.            Peters, M. D., Wieder, B., Sutton, S. G., & Wakefield, J. (2016). Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 21, 1-17.

                 xl.            Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46(3), 159-166.

               xli.            Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236–263.

             xlii.            Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2013). Information systems success: the quest for the independent variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7–62

           xliii.            Popovič, A., Hackney, R., Coelho, P. S., & Jaklič, J. (2012). Towards business intelligence systems success: Effects of maturity and culture on analytical decision-making. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 729-739.

           xliv.            Popovič, A., Hackney, R., Coelho, P. S., & Jaklič, J. (2014). How information-sharing values influence the use of information systems: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(4), 270-283.

             xlv.            Rai, A., Lang, S., and Welker, R. (2002). Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis. Information Systems Research, 13 (1), 50-69.

           xlvi.            Ringle, Christian M., Wende, Sven, & Becker, Jan-Michael. (2014). Smartpls 3. Hamburg: SmartPLS. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com).

         xlvii.            Rouhani, S., Ashrafi, A., Zare, A., & Afshari, S. (2016). The impact model of business intelligence on decision support and organizational benefits. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(1).

       xlviii.            Seddon, P. and Yip, S. K. (1992). An Empirical Evaluation of User Information Satisfaction (UIS) Measures for Use with General Ledger Account Software.  Journal of Information Systems, 6(spring), 75-92.

           xlix.            Seddon, P. B. (1997). A Respecification and Extension of the Delone and Mclean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research, 8 (3), 240-53.

                    l.            Seddon, P. B., Graeser, V., and Willcocks, L. P. (2002). Measuring Organizational IS Effectiveness: An Overview and Update of Senior Management Perspectives. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 33 (2), 7-9.

                  li.            Seddon, P. B., Staples, S., Patnayakuni, R., and Bowtell, M. (1999). Dimensions of Information Systems Success. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2 (October), 2-39.

                lii.            Serumaga-Zake, P. A. (2017). The role of user satisfaction in implementing a Business Intelligence System. South African Journal of Information Management, 19(1), 1-8.

              liii.            Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. (1949), the Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

               liv.            Sparks, B. H., & McCann, J. T. (2015). Factors influencing business intelligence system use in decision-making and organizational performance. International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management, 5(1), 31-54.

                 lv.            Trieu, V. H. (2017). Getting value from Business Intelligence systems: A review and research agenda. Decision Support Systems, 93, 111-124.

               lvi.            Tunowski, R. (2015). Business Intelligence in Organization. Benefits, Risks, and Developments. Przedsiebiorczosc I Zarzadzanie, 16(2), 133-144.

             lvii.            Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478.

           lviii.            Visinescu, L. L., Jones, M. C., & Sidorova, A. (2017). Improving Decision Quality: The Role of Business Intelligence. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 57(1), 58-66.

               lix.            W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean. Information Systems Success Measurement. Foundations and Trends in Information Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–116, 2016.

                 lx.            Wieder, B., & Ossimitz, M. L. (2015). The impact of Business Intelligence on the quality of decision-making–a mediation model. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 1163-1171.

               lxi.            Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information systems research, 16(1), 85-102.

             lxii.            Wixom, B., & Watson, H. (2012). The BI-based organization. Organizational Applications of Business Intelligence Management: Emerging Trends, IGI Global, Hershey, 193-208.

           lxiii.            Yang, J., Pinsonneault, A., & Hsieh, J. J. (2017, January). Understanding Intention to Explore Business Intelligence Systems: The Role of Fit and Engagement. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

           lxiv.            Yeoh, W., & Koronios, A. (2010). Critical success factors for business intelligence systems. Journal of computer information systems, 50(3), 23-32.

Cite this Article: