Moderating Effect of Collaborative Capability on the Relationship between Green Procurement and Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Kenya
Author(s)
Rutere Yusuf , Willy Muturi , Noor Shalle ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 01-10 | Views: 693 | Downloads: 249 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4990198
Abstract
Purpose: to establish moderating effect of collaborative capability on the relationship between green procurement and performance of manufacturing firms in Kenya. The theoretical background arose from the literature on competitive strategy, firm performance and green supply chain management.
Methodology/Material: The study adopted descriptive survey design using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The study targeted 943 manufacturing firms in Kenya registered under the Kenya Association of Manufacturers as at the year 2017. A sample size of 330 firms was targeted and obtained by use of stratified random sampling. Primary data was collected using questionnaire that was addressed to firms operational and procurement managers. Descriptive statistics was used aided by Statistical Packages for Social Sciences version 21 to compute percentages of respondents ‘answers. Inferential statistics using multiple regression and correlation analysis was applied to assist examining relationship between the research variable.
Findings: The findings showed that green procurement had significant and positive effect on performance of manufacturing firms in Kenya. Further, collaborative capacity moderates the relationship green procurement and firm performance.
Conclusion/implication: As such, adoption of flexible green procurement practices through appropriate research will help the manufacturing firm to meet diverse yet drastic changing needs as well as address challenges arising from a dynamic global business environment. Therefore, it is utmost necessary for the firms to use inputs with relatively low environmental impacts.
Keywords
Collaborative Capability, Performance, Manufacturing, Green Procurement Practices
References
i. Ahi, P. & searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 5(2), 329-341.
ii. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
iii. Brandenburg, M., Govindan, K., Sarkis, J. & Seuring, S. (2014). Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: developments and directions. European journal of operational research, 233(2), 299-312.
iv. Cao, M., & Mhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of operations management, 29(3), 163-180.
v. Carter, R., & Easton, P. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 41(1), 46-62.
vi. Fahy, J. (2000). The resource-based view of the firm: some stumbling-blocks on the road to understanding sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of european industrial training, 24(2/3/4), 94-104.
vii. Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of supply chain management, 50(1), 44-55.
viii. Seuring, S. (2013). A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decision support systems, 54(4), 1513-1520.
ix. Shi, V., Lenny koh, S. C., Baldwin, J., & Cucchiella, F. (2012). Natural resource based green supply chain management. Supply chain management: an international journal, 17(1), 54-67.
x. Shi, W., sun, J., & Prescott, E. (2012). A temporal perspective of merger and acquisition and strategic alliance initiatives: review and future direction. Journal of management, 38(1), 164-209.
xi. Sullivan, G. (2011). A primer on the validity of assessment instruments. Journal of business research
xii. Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2010). Shadows and lights of gscm (green supply chain management): determinants and effects of these practices based on a multi-national study. Journal of cleaner production, 18(10-11), 953-962.
xiii. Vachon, S., & Klassen, D. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: the role of collaboration in the supply chain. International journal of production economics, 111(2), 299-315.
xiv. Xie, Y., & Breen, l. (2012). Greening community pharmaceutical supply chain in UK: a cross boundary approach. Supply chain management: an international journal, 17(1), 40-53.
xv. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, H. (2005). Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International journal of production economics, 111(2), 261-273.
Cite this Article: