The State of Auditing Quality of Banks Financial Statements is done by the State Audit of Vietnam

Author(s)

Thi Ngoc Thuy Tran , Thi Thu Trang Nguyen , Thanh Trung Nguyen ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 207-220 | Views: 518 | Downloads: 159 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5045134

Volume 10 - January 2021 (01)

Abstract

The study assessed the current state of auditing quality of financial statements of banks conducted by the State Audit of Vietnam in the period 2015-2019 through the primary database collected from the social survey. study, consult the team leader, group leader and auditors (audit team members) and through in-depth interviews with leaders who are the General Director / Deputy General Director or Head of the Supervisory Board of the banks. State Audit of Vietnam performs the audit

Keywords

Auditing, banking, financial statements, state audit, Vietnam

References

                   i.            Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), 2004. Basel II: International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework - Comprehensive Version.

      ii.            Beaver, W. H., Ryan, S. G., & Wahlen, J. M., 1997. When is ‘‘bad news” viewed as ‘‘good news”?, Financial Analysis Journal, Vol 53, Issue 1, 45–54.

    iii.            Boon, K., McKinnon, J., & Ross, P., 2008. Audit service quality in compulsory audit tendering, Accounting Research Journal.

     iv.            Behn, B.K., Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R. and Hermanson, R.H., 1997. The Determinants of Audit Client Satisfaction among Clients of Big 6 Firms, Accounting Horizons, American Accounting Association, 7–24.

       v.            Bradshaw, M. T., Richardson, S. A., & Sloan, R. G., 2001. Do Analysts and Auditors Use Information in Accruals?, Journal of Accounting and Research, Vol 39, Issue 1, 45 – 74.

     vi.            Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, R. H., & McGrath, N. T., 1992. Audit Quality Attributes: The Perceptions of Audit Partners, Preparers, and Financial Statement Users, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 11(1), 1- 15.

   vii.            Chen, C. Y., Lin, C. J., & Lin, Y. C., 2008. Audit Partner Tenure, Audit Firm Tenure, and Discretionary Accruals: Does Longterm Auditor Tenure Impair Earnings Quality?, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol 25, Issue 2, 415 – 445.

 viii.            Coe, T. L., & Palmon, D., 1979. Some evidence of the magnitude of auditor turnover, Unpublished manuscript, New York University, New York.

     ix.            Collins, J. H., Shackelford, D. A., & Wahlen, J. M., 1995. Bank differences in the coordination of regulatory capital, earnings, and taxes, Accounting Research, Vol 33, Issue 2, 263–291.

       x.            Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., & Taylor, S. L. , 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specialisations, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 297-322.

     xi.            Cushing, J. M., 1989. A competition model for size-structured species, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 49(3), 838-858.

   xii.            DeAngelo, L. E., 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 183 – 199.

 xiii.            Duff, A., 2004. Auditqual: Dimensions of Audit Quality, The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.

 xiv.            Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2006. Promoting audit quality: Discussion Paper, London.

   xv.            Francis, J.R., 2011. A framework for understanding and researching audit quality, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30 (2), 125 - 152.

 xvi.            Greenawalt, M. B., & Sinkey, J. F. , 1988. Bank loan-loss provisions and the income-smoothing hypothesis: An empirical analysis, 1976 – 1984, Journal of Financial Services Research, Vol 1, Issue 4, 301 – 318.

xvii.            Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M., 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting, Accounting Horizons, Vol 13, Issue 4, 365–383.

xviii.            International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), 2013. A framework for Audit Quality, New York.

 xix.            International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), 2013. Audit quality: An IAASB Perspective, New York.

   xx.            Kanagaretnam, K., Krishnan, G. V., & Lobo, G. J., 2010. An empirical analysis of auditor independence in the banking industry, The Accounting Review, Vol 85, Issue 6, 2011 – 2046.

 xxi.            Knechel W. R., Krishnam, V., Pevzner, M., 2013. Audit quality: Insights from the Academic Literature Auditing, A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32 (1), 385-421.

xxii.            Lee T.H., Azham M.A., 2018. The evolution of auditing: An Analysis of the Historical Development, Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, Vol 4, Issue 12, David Publishing Company, Inc.

xxiii.            Liu, C. C., & Ryan, S. G., 1995. The effect of bank loan portfolio composition on the market reaction to and anticipation of loan loss provisions, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol 3, Issue 1, 77 – 94.

xxiv.            Liu, C. C., Ryan, S. G., & Wahlen, J. M., 1997. Differential valuation implications of loan loss provisions across banks and fiscal quarters, Accounting Review, Vol 72, Issue 1, 133–146.

xxv.            Maines, L. A., Bartov, E., Fairfield, P., Hirst, D. E., Iannaconi, T. E., Mallett, R. & Vincent, L., 2003. Evaluating concepts-based vs rules-based approaches to standard setting, Accounting Horizons, Vol 17, Issue 1, 73 – 89.

xxvi.            Mock, T. J., & Samet, M., 1982. A multi atribute model for audit evaluation, Journal of Accounting Research, 99 – 112.

xxvii.            Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H., 1987. Chapter 7: the assessment  of reliability, Psychometric theory.

xxviii.            Palmrose, Z.V., 2011. Review of studies on audit quality, International Conference on Humanities, Society and Culture, IPEDR Vol.20, IACSIT Press, Singapore.

xxix.            Pérez, D., Salas-Fumas, V., & Saurina, J., 2008. Earnings and capital management in alternative loan loss provision regulatory regimes, European Accounting Review, Vol 17, 423-445.

xxx.            Scholes, M. S., Wilson, G. P., & Wolfson, M. A., 1990. Tax planning, regulatory capital planning, and financial reporting strategy for commercial banks, Review of Financial Studies, Vol 3, Issue 4, 625–650.

xxxi.            Schroeder, M. S., Solomon, I., & Vickrey, D., 1986,. Audit quality: The perceptions of Audit-Committee Chairpersons and Audit Partners, A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol 5, 86 – 94.

xxxii.            Schipper, K., 1989. Commentary on earnings management, Accounting Horizons, Vol 3, Issue 1, 91 – 102.

xxxiii.            Sherolli Jr, X., 2016. Determinants of Audit Quality in the USA Banking Sector, International Hellenic University, USA.

xxxiv.            Sutton, S. G., & Lampe, J. C., 1991. A framework for evaluating process quality for Audit Engagements, Accounting and Business Research, Vol 21, 275 – 288.

xxxv.            Treadway, J. C., 1987. Report of the national commission on fraudulent financial reporting, The Commission.

xxxvi.            Warming-Rasmussen, B., & Jensen, L., 1998. Quality Dimensions in External Audit Services – An External User Perspective, European Accounting Review, Vol 7, Issue 1, 65–82.

xxxvii.            Wooten, T. C., 2003. Research about audit quality, The CPA Journal, 73(1), 48.

xxxviii.            Yasar, A., 2013. Big Four Auditor’s Audit Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence from Turkish Stock Market, International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol 4 (17).

Thi Ngoc Thuy Tran , The State of Auditing Quality of Banks Financial Statements is done by the State Audit of Vietnam, International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research 01(2021):207-220 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5045134