To Determine the Effectiveness of Grapevine as a Communication Method in Tertiary Management

Author(s)

Mohammad Akbar Hossen , IbnaliIssah Kulo , Zafar Iqbal , Irtaza Ishtiaq ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 88-97 | Views: 462 | Downloads: 140 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5045329

Volume 10 - March 2021 (03)

Abstract

With the use of numerous social media sites, technology has enabled cheap and fast communication. Grapevine was traditionally passed from one person to another without the use of intermediaries. Due to social media, the rate of information sharing by grapevine has increased greatly. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of grapevine as a contact technique in tertiary administration during the COVID-19 pandemic. A case study was conducted in the Department of Computer Science at a Zimbabwean state university. Employees and students who received information from managers in a formal way were opposed to those who received information via the grapevine. Document processing and interviews were used to gather the data. This data was analysed, and the efficiency of grapevine was calculated. The efficiency of grapevine correspondence was assessed in terms of the information that could be obtained, the accuracy of the information, the degree of manipulation, the rate of transmission from sender to receiver, and whether two-way communication was possible.

Keywords

Administration, Grapevine, Listening, Information, Portal, Social Media

References

                    i.            Cohen, J. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences. London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.

      ii.            Creswell (2017), Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Los Angeles.

    iii.            Garrett ( 2016), Critiquing Quantitative Research Reports: Key Points for the Beginner, international journal of faith community

     iv.            Grapevine Communication. (2017, Feb 20). Retrieved May 8, 2020, from https://phdessay.com/grapvinecommunication/

       v.            Kukreja, S. (2017).Types of Communication in Organization. Management Study HQ

     vi.            Papa, Michael J., Tom D. Daniels, and Barry K. Spiker (1997). Organizational Communication Perspectives and Trends (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc. ISBN 1-4129-1684-4.

   vii.            Patil Sandeep. (2017) Advantages and Disadvantages of Grapevine Communication, Articles Junction Blog

 viii.            Saunders M, (2009) Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson, New York.

     ix.            Hutton, G. & Fosdick, M. (2019). The globalization of Social Media, Consumer Relationships with Brands Evolve in the Digital Space. Journal of Advertising Research

       x.            Toppr, 2019. Internal and External Communication, Business Communication Blog

     xi.            Kaplan A. & Haenlein M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons 53, 59-68.

   xii.            Zohrabi, (2015), Reliability & Validity of Research Instruments, Researchgate

Cite this Article: