Internal Assessment for Underwriting Risk to Estimate the Solvency Capital Requirements Applied to Egyptian Non-Life Insurance Companies

Author(s)

Nashed Abdelsallam , Asmaa Mohamed Hussein ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 01-17 | Views: 587 | Downloads: 158 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5066653

Volume 10 - June 2021 (06)

Abstract

the aim of this research is to estimate the solvency capital requirements and financial planning for the underwriting risk with application to non-life Egyptian insurance companies using the partial capital Model. Additionally, this research calibrates the underwriting risk using the undertaking- specific Parameters (USPs) as input for own Risk and solvency assessment (ORSA) in order to estimate the key volatility of risks, which enhances the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework for Egyptian non-life insurance companies. Finally, this research aimed to tested the quality of the capital model, determine the one-year change and quantify the one-year reserve risk a as a portion of the ultimate risk (emergence risk),which are considered the important steps towards validation the reserving risk of capital model and  understanding the reserve risk assessment from ultimate to the one-year reserve risk. This paper suggested partial capital model using the statistical-analytic methods, Mathematical methods and Scenario shocks based on the excel calculations with the help of a supported tool of solvency II called Quantitative Impact Study5 (QIS5).The authors selected value at Risk (VAR) with 99.5% over one-year time horizon, which is consistent with solvency II. This research with will be guide for the future decisions on assessment of underwriting risks and integrate the capital model into of any insurance company’s ERM plan.

Keywords

Internal Capital Model, Solvency II, own Risk and solvency assessment (ORSA), underwriting risks, solvency Capital requirements (SCR).

References

         i            Anzsar,J., Armstrong,J., Austin,R., Bartliff, C.and Cairns,.M.(2012).“Practical Issues in the Solvency II Internal Model Approval Process (IMAP) for General Insurance Actuaries”, Available at:https://www.actuaries.org.uk/documents/brian-hey-prize-practical-issues-solvency-ii-internal-model-approval-process-  imap-general-insurance (accessed 10 August 2012)

      ii            Bermúdez, L., Ferri Vidal, A. and Guillén, M. ( 2013). ” A correlation sensitivity analysis of non-life underwriting risk in solvency capital requirement estimation”. ASTIN Bulletin, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 21-37.

       iii            Cadoni,P. (2014). “Internal models and solvency II: From Regulation to Implementation”. Risk Books,  England.

   iv            CEIOPS. (2010). “QIS5 Technical Specification”. European Insurance and occupational Pension Authority, http://www.ceiops.eu/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=732

      v            Clemente, G.P. and Savelli, N. (2013). “Internal model techniques of premium and reserve risk for non-life insurers”.  Mathematical Methods in Economics and Finance, Vol. 8 No.1, pp. 21-34.

       vi            Dacorogna, M.M.( 2017).”Approaches and techniques to validate internal model results”,  Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2983837.

      vii            Dreksler, S., Allen, C., Akoh-Arrey, A., Courchene, J.A., Junaid, B., Kirk, J., Lowe, W., O’Dea, S., Piper, J., Shah, M. and Shaw, G.( 2016).” Solvency II Technical Provisions For General Insurers”. British Actuarial Journal, Vol.20 No.1, pp.7-129.

       viii            England, P.D., Verrall, R.J. and Wüthrich, M.V. ( 2019).” on the lifetime and one-year views of reserve risk , with application to IFRS 17 and Solvency II risk margins”. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Vol. 85, pp.74-88.

      ix            Elias, V.I.R. ( 2013).  “Reserve risk: an application to ORSA”. Master Thesis, The university of De Lisboa.  Institute Superior of Economics and Management.

       x            Hill,G. (2008) . ”Solvency II and UK internal capital assessment”.working paper, Deloitte&Touche LLP  ,19 September.

      xi            Kaļiņina, D. and Voronova, I.  (2013) . “Risk Management Improvement under the Solvency II Framework”. Economics and Business, Vol. 24 No.4, pp. 29-36.

     xii            Kočović, J. and Koprivica, M. (2018). “An internal model for measuring premium risk when determining solvency of non-life insurers”. Economic Annals, vol. 63 No. 217, pp.99-127.

 xiii   Krvavych ,Y. (2013). ”Making use of Internal Models”. ASTIN Colloquium, Available at:         https://www.actuaries.org/ASTIN/Colloquia/Hague/Papers/Krvavych.pdf/ (accessed 25 February 2014)

    xiv            Lavelle, D., O’Donnell, A., Pender, D., Roberts, D. and Tulloch, D.  (2010).” The Solvency II ORSA Process”. working paper, Society of Actuaries in Ireland.

  xv         McNeil, A.J., Kirchner, A. and Kretzschmar, G.L. (2008). “The case for fully integrated models of economic capital”, Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1317251 (accessed 10 February 2009)

 xvi   Merz, M. and Wuthrich, M.V. ( 2014). “Claims run-off uncertainty: the full picture”, Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper, Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2524352  (accessed 3 July 2015)

  xvii      Scarth, R., Jain, S. and Roberto, R.( 2020).” A practitioner’s introduction to stochastic reserving the one-year view”. working paper, Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.

    xviii            Pelkiewicz, A.J., Ahmed, S.W., Fulcher, P., Johnson, K.L., Reynolds, S.M., Schneider, R.J. and Scott, A.J. (2020). “A review of the risk margin–Solvency II and beyond”. British Actuarial Journal,Vol.25 No.1,PP.1-72.

    xix            Wüthrich, M.V. and Merz, M. (2008).” Stochastic claims reserving methods in insurance”.John Wiley & Sons. Germany.

    xx            Wüthrich, M.V. , Merz, M., Bühlmann, H., De Felice, M., Gisler, A. and Moriconi, F. ( 2008). “Modelling the claims development result for solvency purposes”. Casualty Actuarial Society E-Forum, pp. 542-568.

   xxi            Zariņa, I., Voronova, I. and Pettere, G .  (2019). “Internal model for insurers: possibilities and issues”. International Scientific Conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, pp. 256-265.

Cite this Article: