Research on Accounting Course Reform in the -Double First-Class- Construction
Author(s)
Dr. Shunhua Yang , ZHU Ya yi , Jessie Magonziwa ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 32-38 | Views: 797 | Downloads: 162 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5363347
Abstract
The curriculum plays an important role in the construction of the “Double First-class” and it calls for curriculum reform. The direct motivation of curriculum reform lies in the boosting of discipline development, the lasting pursuit lies in improving the university grade, and the fundamental purpose lies in changing from memorial learning to understandable learning. Taking the depth reform of accounting course as an example—the specific reform includes the curriculum goal, which meets the requirements in the intelligent age, the understandable general knowledge throughout the course content and interactive curriculum implementation. Thus, to improve the quality of accounting could further realize the value of the curriculum for the construction of “Double First-class”.
Keywords
Double First-class; curriculum reform; accounting ,intelligent age
References
i ke Zheng. Curriculum building in "Double first-class": the inspiration of NYU Shanghai [J].Higher education in China,2016 (Z2): 53-56.
ii Mayanchi.”Double first-class " construction and university development [J].Journal of the National Academy of education administration, 2016 (9): 9-14.
iii Zhou Guangli. Academic breakthrough in the construction of “Double first—class” - on the integration of university disciplines, majors and courses [J].Educational Research, 2016(5): 72-76.
iv Jin Yule, Li Hongmei. Experience and inspiration in the cultivation of top-notch innovative talents at research universities in the UK [J].Higher education research, 2017, 38 (6): 98-104.
v Zhang Chuyan. Taste college taste [J].Higher education research, 2001 (4): 10-15.
vi Wu Zhikui. On curriculum and student happiness-a perspective based on knowledge meaning [J].Educational Review, 2009(5): 48-51.
vii Zhang Mingkai.”Double first-class " construction and curriculum change [J].University Education Management, 2018 (3): 7-12.
viii Xu Jichun. The dimension of the meaning of the course understanding [J].Educational Research, 2012(12): 71-76.
ix Zhang Hua. Towards learning philosophy [J].Shanghai education and research, 2004 (2): 47-49.
x Xiang Xian Ming. Pan-educational theory. Ph. D. thesis, School of Science and education, Nanjing Normal University, 1997:92.
xi Zhou Yanyong, Zhou Zuoyu. An empirical study on the relationship between college students and teachers [J].Higher education research，2005，26 (03):79-84.
Cite this Article: