Narrow Market Business Level Strategies Performance of Micro and Small Enterprises
Author(s)
Adote Philemon Addo , Ibn Ali Issah Kulo ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 37-48 | Views: 378 | Downloads: 72 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6162583
Abstract
Contrary to popular belief, there has been little empirical research on the impact of cost-cutting and product diversification on the success of micro- and small-sized businesses, therefore this study is needed to fill the knowledge gap. With a focus on salons and beauty spas in Jakarta County, the goal of this research was to see how generic limited market strategies affected the performance of small enterprises, particularly micro and tiny ones. The study used a descriptive research design, using Jakarta County's 279 salons and beauty spas as the study's target population and a sample size of 165 participants. Quantitative data was collected by a standardized questionnaire. Research shows that at a 5 percent level of significance, focused cost strategy has moderately positive significant impact on micro and small firms' performance, whereas focused differentiation strategy has moderately positive significant impact. In the research, it is recommended that micro and small businesses maintain their knowledge, innovation, and constant improvement, as well as design methods for creating competitive, inexpensive, and appealing rates, as well as plans for premium items in a specialised limited market
Keywords
Focused cost leadership strategy, Focused differentiation strategy, Generic strategies, Micro and small enterprises performance, Narrow market, Performance, Salons and beauty spas
References
i. Adler, P. S., and Seok-Woo Kwon. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 27:17–40.
ii. Alexander, J., and P. Alexander. 2000. From kinship to contract? Production chains in the Javanese woodworking industries. Human Organization 59 (1): 106–16.
iii. Anderson, A. R., and S. Jack. 2002. The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: A glue or lubricant? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 14:193–210.
iv. Badan Pusat Statistik (Central Bureau of Statistics) South Sulawesi. 2004. Population Statistics 2003. Makassar: Badan Pusat Statistik.
v. Barr, A. 1998 Enterprise performance and the functional diversity of social capital. Working paper, Centre for the Study of African Economies. Available at http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/workingpapers/ pdfs/9801text.pdf (last accessed 27 June 2007). ———. 2000. Social capital and technical information flows in the Ghanaian manufacturing sector. Oxford Economic Papers 52 (3): 539–59.
vi. Beard, V. A. 2005. Individual determinants of participation in community development in Indonesia. Environment And Planning C—Government and Policy 23 (1): 21–39. Bebbington,A. 1999. Capitals and capabilities:A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development 27 (12): 2021–44. ———. 2004. Social capital and development studies 1: Critique, debate, progress? Progress in Development Studies 4 (4): 343–49.
vii. Bebbington, A., L. Dharmawan, E. Fahmi, and S. Guggenheim. 2006. Local capacity, village governance, and the political economy of rural development in Indonesia. World Development 34 (11): 1958–76.
viii. Carney, D. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: What contributions can we make? London: Department for International Development.
ix. Chambers, R., and G. Conway. 1991. Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century.IDS Discussion Paper 296. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
x. Coleman, J. 1987. Norms as social capital. In Economic imperialism: The economic method applied outside the field of economics, ed. G. Radnitzky and P. Bernholz, 135–55. New York: Paragon.
xi. De Koninck, R. 1994. L’Asie du Sud-Est [Southeast Asia]. Paris: Masson.
xii. de Soto, H. 1989.The other path: The invisible revolution in the Third World. New York: HarperCollins.
xiii. Drake, C. 1989. National integration in Indonesia. Patterns and policies. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
xiv. Durlauf, S. 1999. The case ‘‘against’’ social capital. Focus 20 (3): 1–4.
xv. Ellis, F. 1998. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. The Journal of Development Studies 35 (1): 1–38.
xvi. Fafchamps, M., and B. Minten. 2001. Social capital and agricultural trade. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 (3): 680–85.
xvii. Fine, B. 2001. Social capital versus social theory. Political economy and social science at the turn of the millennium. London: Routledge.
xviii. Foley, M. W., and B. Edwards. 1999. Is it time to disinvest in social capital? Journal of Public Policy 19 (2): 141–73.
xix. Gertler, P., D. I. Levine, and E.Moretti. 2006. Is social capital the capital of the poor? The role of family and community in helping insure living standards against health shocks. CESifo Economic Studies 52 (3): 455–99.
xx. Harriss, J. 2002. Depoliticizing development. The World Bank and social capital. Wimbledon: Anthem.
xxi. Hassler, M. 2005. Home-working in rural Bali: The organization of production and labor relations. The Professional Geographer 57 (4): 530–38.
xxii. Hill, H. 1997. Indonesia’s industrial transformation. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
xxiii. Huber, L., and A. Steinhauf. 1997. Social networks and economic development in Peru: The new protagonists. Anthropos 92 (4–6): 535–49.
xxiv. Isham, J., and S. Ka¨hko¨nen. 2002.How do participation and social capital affect community-based water projects? Evidence from Central Java, Indonesia. In The role of social capital in development. An empirical assessment, ed. C.Grootaert and T. van Bastelaer, 155–287. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
xxv. Joseph, R. 1987. Worker, middlewomen, entrepreneur: Women in the Indonesian batik industry. Bangkok: The Population Council.
xxvi. Kahn, J. S. 1980. Minangkabau social formations: Indonesian peasants and the world-economy. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Lin, N. 2001. Social capital. A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
xxvii. Lyon, F. 2000. Trust, networks, and norms: The creation of social capital in agricultural economies in Ghana. World Development 28 (4): 663–81.
xxviii. Manning, C. 1998. Indonesian labour in transition. An East Asian success story? Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
xxix. Mayoux, L. 2001. Tackling the down side: Social capital, women’s empowerment and micro-finance in Cameroon. Development and Change 32 (3): 435–64.
xxx. Meagher, K. 2006. Social capital, social liabilities, and political capital: Social networks and informal manufacturing in Nigeria. African Affairs 105 (421): 553–82.
xxxi. Mohan, G., and J.Mohan. 2002. Placing social capital. Progress in Human Geography 26 (2): 191–210. Murphy, J. T. 2006. Building trust in economic space. Progress in Human Geography 30 (4): 427–50.
xxxii. Narayan, S. N. 2002. On the empirics of social capital. The Economic Journal 112 (November): F459–F479.
xxxiii. Neace, M. B. 2004. The impact of low trust on economic development: The case of Latin America. Review of Policy Research 21 (5): 699–713.
xxxiv. Pelras, C. 1996. The Bugis. Cambridge, U.K.: Blackwell.
xxxv. Peng, Y. S. 2004. Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China’s transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology 109 (5): 1045–74.
xxxvi. Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24:1–24.
xxxvii. Portes, A., and P. Landolt. 2000. Social capital: Promise and pitfalls of its role in development. Journal of Latin American Studies 32:529–47.
xxxviii. Putnam, R. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
xxxix. Rakowski, C. A. 1994. Convergence and divergence in the informal sector debate: A focus on Latin America, 1984–92. World Development 22 (4): 501–16.
xl. Reinke, J. 1998. Does solidarity pay?The case of the small enterprise foundation, South Africa. Development and Change 29 (3): 553–76.
xli. Schuurman, F. J. 2003. Social capital: The politicoemancipatory potential of a disputed concept.Third World Quarterly 24 (6): 991–1010.
xlii. Schwarz, A. 1994. A nation in waiting. Indonesia in the 1990s. Australia: Allen and Unwin.
xliii. Silvey, R., and R. Elmhirst. 2003. Engendering social capital: Women workers and rural-urban networks in Indonesia’s crisis. World Development 31:865–79.
xliv. Taylor, M. 2002. Enterprise, embeddedness and exclusion: Business and development in Fiji. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 93 (3): 302–15.
xlv. Turner, S., and An Phuong Nguyen. 2005. Young entrepreneurs, social capital and Doi Moi in Hanoi, Viet Nam. Urban Studies 42 (10): 1–18.
xlvi. Weijland, H. 1999. Microenterprise clusters in rural Indonesia: Industrial seedbed and policy target. World Development 27 (9): 1515–30.
xlvii. Woolcock, M. 2001. The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Isuma 2:11–17.
xlviii. Woolcock, M., and D. Narayan. 2000. Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer 15 (2): 225–49.
Cite this Article: