The Educational System in Oman and its Effect on the Attainment of High School Students
Author(s)
Download Full PDF Pages: 21-36 | Views: 344 | Downloads: 76 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6162542
Abstract
This research is intended to find out the impact of the educational system in Oman and its effect on the attainment of high school students. A questionnaire was used as a tool for collecting information. It was distributed online using social media applications. 100 respondents answered the questionnaire and a statistical analysis was conducted to reach a conclusion. Teachers were found to be the main element in the educational process with a large percentage. Educational system has a significant effect on the attainment of high school students.
Keywords
Educational System, Attainment, Tasks Accomplished, Distinguished Teachers, Curriculum, Knowledge, Skills Obtained
References
i. Center for American Progress. (2010, April 22). Expanded learning time by the numbers: The traditional school calendar is failing to meet many students' needs. Retrieved from http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education/news/2010/04/22/7716/expanded-learning-time-by-the-numbers
ii. Cherepinsky, V. (2011). Self-reflective grading: Getting students to learn from their mistakes. PRIMUS: Journal of Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 21(3), 294–301.
iii. Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. A. (2008, autumn). Is time up for ability grouping? EQ Australia, 31–33.
iv. Cunningham, P. M., & Allington, R. L. (2010). Classrooms that work: They can all read and write. New York: Pearson.
v. Dweck, C. S. (2010). Mind-sets and equitable education. Principal Leadership, 10(5), 26–29
vi. Fiona K. Mensah, et.al, (2010),"Gender differences in educational attainment: influences of the family environment", British Educational Research Journal, pp. 239-260.
vii. Fullan, M. (2011, May). Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform. (Centre for Strategic Education Seminar Series Paper No. 204). Available: www.michaelfullan.ca/home_articles/SeminarPaper204.pdf.
viii. Guskey, T. R. (2011, November). Five obstacles to grading reform. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 16–21.
ix. Guskey, T. R., & Jung, L. A. (2013). Answers to essential questions about standards, assessments, grading, and reporting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
x. Hall, G., & Hord, S. (2010). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
xi. Halpern, D. F., Eliot, L., Bigler, R. S., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Hyde, J., Liben, L. S., & Martin, C. L. (2011, September 23). The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling. Science, 333(6050), 1706–1707.
xii. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
xiii. Hattie, J. (2011). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge.
xiv. Hipp, K. K., & Huffman, J. B. (Eds.). (2010). demystifying professional learning communities: School leadership at its best. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
xv. Holthouse, D. (2010, spring). Gender education: Separate but effective? Teaching Tolerance, 46(37). Available: http://www.tolerance.org/magazine/number-37-spring-2010/feature/gender-segregation-separate-effective
xvi. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
xvii. Kirp, D. (2013, February 9). The secret to fixing bad schools. New York Times. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/10/opinion/sunday/the-secret-to-fixing-bad-schools.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
xviii. Knight, J. (2011). Unmistakable impact: A partnership approach for dramatically improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
xix. Kohn, A. (2010). How to create nonreaders: Reflections on motivation, learning, and sharing power. English Journal, 100(1). Retrieved from http://www.alfiekohn.org/teaching/nonreaders.htm
xx. Lemov, D. (2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put students on the path to college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
xxi. Lezotte, L. W., & Snyder, K. M. (2011). What effective schools do: Re-envisioning the correlates. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
xxii. Loveless, T. (2012). How well are American students learning? (Brown Center Report). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
xxiii. Loveless, T. (2013). The resurgence of ability grouping and persistence of tracking. (Part II of the 2013 Brown Center Report on American Education). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
xxiv. Marzano, R. J., Frontier, T., & Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
xxv. McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2013). Essential questions: Opening doors to student understanding. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
xxvi. Mielke, P., & Frontier, T. (2012, November). Keeping improvement in mind. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 10–13.
xxvii. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2010). The gap between enrolling in college and being ready for college. Author.
xxviii. *National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Authors.
xxix. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2010 results. Paris: Author.
xxx. Patel, E. A., Cooper, H., & Allen, A. B. (2010). Extending the school day or school year: A systematic review of research (1985–2009). Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 401–436. doi: 10.3102/0034654310377086
xxxi. Pew. (2011, April 20). Driving to 54.5 MPG: The history of fuel economy. Available: http://www.pewenvironment.org/news-room/fact-sheets/driving-to-545-mpg-the-history-of-fuel-economy-329037
xxxii. Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
xxxiii. Rickabaugh, J. (2012). The learning independence continuum. Pewaukee, WI: The Institute @ CESA #1.
xxxiv. Robinson, K. (2010). Changing paradigms. Retrieved from http://www.thersa.org/events/rsaanimate/animate/rsa-animate-changing-paradigms
xxxv. Salman, Ainin (1986)," Some Problems In The Educational System In Jordan" University of London Institute of Education, pp. 160-250.
xxxvi. Sax, L. (2010). Girls on the edge: The four factors driving the new crisis for girls. New York: Basic Books.
xxxvii. Schlechty, P. C. (2011). Engaging students: The next level of working on the work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
xxxviii. Shuili, et al. (2004), "Study of English in physics as seen by supervising teachers", Journal of the Federation of Arab Universities for Education and Psychology,Vol 4,Issue 2,pp.90-54.
xxxix. Silver, H., Dewing, R.T., & Perini, M.J. (2012). The core six: Essential strategies for achieving excellence with the Common Core. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
xl. Strong, M. (2011). The highly qualified teacher: What is teacher quality and how do you measure it? New York: Teachers College Press.
xli. Strong, J. H. (2010). Effective teachers = student achievement: What the research says. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
xlii. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Barokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011, March). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. doi: 10.3102/0034654310393361
xliii. Tucker, M. S. (Ed.). (2011). Surpassing Shanghai: An agenda for American education built on the world's leading systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
xliv. Voltz, D. L., Sims, M. J., & Nelson, B. (2010). Connecting teachers, students, and standards: Strategies for success in diverse and inclusive classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
xlv. Worthy, J. (2010). Only the names have been changed: Ability grouping revisited. Urban Review, 42(4), 271–295.
xlvi. Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They are not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267–301
Cite this Article: