Determinants Of Intention To Vaccinate Against Covid 19: An Approach Based On The Theory Of Interpersonal Behavior
Author(s)
Meryem ZOGHLAMI , Salma AYEB ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 01-12 | Views: 268 | Downloads: 76 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6911840
Abstract
while widespread availability of vaccines is encouraging news for the world's population, a well developed set of strategies is required to promote vaccine acceptance and encourage people to get vaccinated. However, studies have revealed that offering information about vaccines is not the only measure to boost vaccine use and participation. This paper explores the factors impacting the intentions to be vaccinated against COVID-19 based on interpersonal behavior theory (Triandis,1980).
An Internet based survey was conducted. A partial least squares structural equation model has been applied to understand determinants for intention to vaccination against Covid 19 on a sample from the Maghreb countries (mainly from Tunisia and Algeria). Final selection of 226 individuals was conducted using social media, direct email, social networks, and in coordination with community groups.
The results of this survey indicate that most respondents are in agreement with vaccination. Efforts to promote vaccination must therefore be continued. They also illustrate the importance of the recommendations of the doctor and family and friends on the intention to be vaccinated. However, the answers to certain questions indicate that a significant proportion of respondents had doubts about the usefulness, effectiveness and safety of the recommended vaccines.
Keywords
Covid19, intention to vaccinate, psychosocial theories, PLS approach, vaccination promotion
References
Albani .V, Butler T, Traill W B and Kennedy O. B (2018), Understanding fruit and vegetable consumption in children and adolescents. The contributions of affect, self-concept and habit strength, Appetite 120,398-408.
Armitage, C. J., Conner, M.: Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review. Psychology & Health. 15(2), 173–189 (2000) doi: org/10.1080/08870440008400299.
Ajzen I, (1991), The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179 211
Ajzen and Fishbein, (1980), cité dans Mc Cormack Brown, K. (1999a). Theory of reasoned action / Theory of planned behavior. Available at: http://hsc.usf.edu/~kmbrown/TRA_TPB.htm).
Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27-58.
Ajzen,I , and Fishbein, M (1980) , Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Englewood Cliff, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Bartsch SM, O’Shea KJ, Ferguson MC, et al. (2020), Vaccine efficacy needed for a COVID-19 coronavirus vaccine to prevent or stop an epidemic as the sole intervention., Am J Prev Med. 59(4):493-503. doi:10.1016/j. amepre.2020.06.011
Barello S, Nania T, Dellafiore F, Graffigna G, Caruso R.(2020) ‘Vaccine hesitancy’ among university students in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Epidemiol. 35(8):781-783. doi:10.1007/s10654-020-00670-z
Bandura, A. and Jourden, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 941-951.
Bélanger D and Godin G (2003), Social Psychology for Public Health and the Environment, In: Environment and Public Health, Foundations and Practices 277- 288, Edisem/Tec et Doc, Acton Vale/Paris
Bergeron, F, Raymond, L, Rivard, S et Gara, S (1995), Determinants of EIS use: Testing a behavioral model. Decision Support Systems, 14, (2), 131-146
Boudokhane. F, (2006 ) , Understanding technical non-use: theoretical reflections Les Enjeux de l'information et de la communication | http://w3.u-grenoble3.fr/les_enjeux |
Davidson, A. R., Jaccard, J. J., Triandis, H. C., Morales, M. L. & Diaz-guerrero, R. Cross-cultural model testing toward a solution of the etic-emic dilemma. International Journal of Psychology 11, 1-13 (1976).
Davidson, A. R., and Jaccard, J. J. (1979). Variables that moderate the attitude–behavior relation: Results of a longitudinal survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1364–1376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1364
Dror AA, Eisenbach N, Taiber S, et al.(2020), Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. Eur J Epidemiol;35(8):775- 779. doi:10.1007/s10654-020-00671
Flynn.L.R, Goldsmith. E.R., Eastman. J.K (1994), The king and summers opinions opinion leadership scale : Revision and refinement, Journal of Business Research, 31, 1, 55- 65
Fiebach N H, Viscoli C M (1991), Patient acceptance of influenza vaccination, The American Journal of Medecine, 91(4):393-400.
Feola.G and Binder C.R (2010), Towards an improved understanding of farmers' behaviour: The integrative agent-centred (IAC) framework, Ecological Economics ,Volume 69, Issue 12, 15 October, Pages 2323-2333
Gagné,C and Godin,G ( 1999), Social cognitive theories: A guide to variable measurement and questionnaire development, Psychosocial Health Research Group, School of Nursing, Laval University.
Godin G, Sheeran P, Conner M, Gagné C, Blondeau D, Germain, M.D., (2004), Study of the determinants of the intention to donate blood among the general population, Research report presented to Héma-Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
Godin, G. et Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behaviour : A review of its applications to health-related behaviours. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(2), 87-98
Montano, D. E. (1986), Predicting and understanding influenza vaccination behavior, Alternatives to the health belief model. Med Care 24, 438-453.
Harapan H, Wagner AL, Yufika A, et al. (2020). Acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine in southeast Asia: a cross-sectional study in Indonesia. Front Public Health ;8:381. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00381
Rosenstock, I, Strecher, V J et Baker M H, (1988), Social learning theory and the health belief model, health education quart, 15, 175 -183 .
Pillutia M.M and Chen X.P. (1999), The context of decisions and evoked social norms, organizational behaviour and human decisions processes, vol 27, n 2, p. 81 -103
Seale, H. et al. (2009). Why do I need it? I am not at risk! Public perceptions towards the pandemic (H1N1) vaccine. BMC Infect Dis 10, 99, doi:1471-2334-10-99
Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 1-36.
Triandis, H,C (1980), The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts, Psychological Review, 96, 506-520
Takahashi et al (2003), Influence of family on acceptance of influenza vaccination among Japanese patients, Family Practice, Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 162–166
Ouellette, J. A. and Wood (1998), W. Habit and Intention in Everyday Life: The Multiple Processes by Which Past Behavior Predicts Future Behavior. Psychological Bulletin 124, 54-74 .
Vayisoglu SK, Zincir H (2019). The Health Action Process Approach-Based Program’s Effects on Influenza Vaccination Behavior. J Nurse Pract;15(7):517-524. doi:10.1016/j.nurpra.2019.04.004
Yanqiu Yu , Sitong Lu , Phoenix Kit-han Mo , Suhua Wang , Junfeng Zhao, Guohua Zhang, Lijuan Li , Liping Li , Joseph Tak-fai Lau. (2021) , Prosociality and Social Responsibility Were Associated With Intention of COVID-19 Vaccination Among University Students in China, International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 1–8.
Wong LP, Alias H, Wong PF, Lee HY, AbuBakar S.(2020), The use of the health belief model to assess predictors of intent to receive the COVID-19 vaccine and willingness to pay. Hum Vaccin Immunother;16(9):2204-2214. doi:10.1080/21645515.2020.1790279
Wang J, Jing R, Lai X, et al. (2020),Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Vaccines (Basel). ;8(3):482. doi:10.3390/vaccines8030482
World Health Organization. Manufacturing, safety and quality control of vaccines.
Available at. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/vaccine-acceptance-is-the-next-hurdle December 4, 2020
World Health Organization. Behavioural considerations for acceptance and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines: WHO technical advisory group on behavioural insights and sciences for health, meeting report, Available at. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/337335 15 October 2020
Cite this Article: