Determinants Influencing the Design and Development of Quality Cost System: The Case of Nam Dinh Seafood Firms
Author(s)
Thi Thu Hoai Pham , Dr. Manh Dung Tran ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 84-91 | Views: 1674 | Downloads: 424 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3474580
Abstract
This research was conducted for investing the impacts of determinants on the establishment (design) and development of the quality cost system in Nam Dinh seafood firms. The data was collected from 69 Nam Dinh seafood firms via questionnaires. The research employs qualitative research method to identify affecting determinants and quantitative research method to analyze the degree to which determinants affect the design and development of the quality cost system. The results show that there are four determinants influencing the establishment and development of the quality cost system, i.e., the accounting system efficiency, firm size, business assets and business cycle (the ratio of profit divided by turnover); among which the accounting system efficiency is the strongest. Hence, this study recommends Nam Dinh seafood firms focus on the accounting system to improve the efficiency of the quality cost system in order to control the quality cost and improve the business performance
Keywords
Quality cost system, seafood firms, Nam Dinh
References
i. Ardeli, G.R. & Raeesi, M. (2004), ‘Investigating costs of quality in small scale industries,’ Proceedings of 2nd International Management Conference, Iran.
ii. Briggs, S., Sutherland, J. & Drummond, S. (2007), ‘Are hotels serving quality? An exploratory study of service quality in the Scottish hotel sector’, Tourism management, 28(4), 1006-1019.
iii. Dehdar, F. (2009), A fuzzy approach to investigating obstacles to the development of cost of quality systems in firms in Tehran Stock Exchange, Master thesis, Islamic Azad University, Irak Branch, Iran.
iv. Emami, R. (2007), Methods for costing quality, Tadbi Publishing House.
v. Gholizadeh, M. H, & Poorbakhsh H. (2010), Management accounting and costs of quality, Guilan University Press.
vi. Horngren, C., Harrison, W. & Robinson, M. (2001), Accounting, 5th Ed, Pearson Education, United State.
vii. Lovea, P. & Iranib, Z. (2003), ‘A project management quality cost information system for the construction industry’, Working paper, Edith Cowan University, UK.
viii. Mobini, G. R. (1998), ‘An applied study on the cost of quality system in the Pharmaceutical industry’, Master thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.
ix. Nikdel, A. R. (1998), Costs of quality: Effective tools in management. Iran Khodro Newsletters.
x. Oliver, J. & Qu, W. (1999), ‘Cost of quality reporting - some Australian evidence’, International Journal of Applied Quality Management, 2(2), 233-250.
xi. Reed, R., Lemak, D. & J-Mer, N. P. (2000), ‘Total quality management and sustainable competitive advantage’, Journal of quality management, 5(1), 5-26.
xii. Robbins, S. P. (1987), Organization Theory: Structures, Designs, and Applications, Prentice-Hall.
xiii. Dinh, P. H. (2014), Economic Research Methodology Writing, Phuong Dong Publishing House, Vietnam.
xiv. Nguyen, D. T. (2013), Methodology of scientific research in business, Finance Publishing House, Vietnam.
xv. Nguyen, T. K. L. (2013), Identification and management of quality costs for Guyomarc’h Vietnam, Master thesis, University of economics Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
xvi. Pham, M. T. (2013), The role of quality cost management in the context of economic downturn, downloaded at http://pnq.com.vn on 11 December 2017.
xvii. Saraee, F. B.S., Banikhedmat, S. & Talemi, M. N. (2013), ‘Factors affecting the development and establishment of the cost of quality system for consumer goods producing companies in Tehran Stock Exchange’, European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(3), 1645-1652.
xviii. Tazeshar, E. S. (2002), ‘Investigating obstacles to the development of cost of quality systems in automobile industry’, Master thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.
xix. Tran, T. D. & To, T. T. (2017), ‘Vietnam economy 2017 and its prospects 2018”, Journal of Economics & Development, 246, 2-15.
Cite this Article: