The Impact of E-Books on Young People and Their Motivation Levels

Author(s)

Dr. Masood Hassan , Ayesha Imran Khan , Muhammad Aqib Khalique , Abdul Moiz ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 100-107 | Views: 191 | Downloads: 64 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6907290

Volume 11 - March 2022 (03)

Abstract

This report summarizes the impact of access to e-book platforms on students and their motivation levels. Schools in the UK Provide performance data before and after e-book projects selection of the group of interviewed students and practitioners and students focus groups allow you to study the initial results in   depth. The average academic performance during the project was eight months. In this study, boys progressed significantly more than girls in reading skills, increasing from an average of seven months to eight months on average compared to girls. The pleasure of learning increased significantly during the project, especially in terms of the pleasure of learning through technology. Many students thought it was good to study after the project. Few of them said that it was difficult to study or that they could not find a study that interested them. In the case of boys, the change in positive attitude was more pronounced. In particular, the pleasure of reading increased for the boys that did it with the least pleasure of reading. The boys who showed no interest in reading at the beginning of the project lead to show a marked change in their reading attitude. Most students prefer to study using technology, but most students do not like the format of their study.

Keywords

Performance, E-Books, Students, Attitude.

References

Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: on screen versus on paper. Journal of experimental psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18.

Brooks, G. (2013). What works for children and young people with literacy difficulties. The effectiveness of intervention schemes.

Brozo, W. G., Shiel, G., & Topping, K. (2007). Engagement in reading: Lessons learned from three PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(4), 304-315.

Burnett, C., & Daniels, K. (2015). Technology and literacy in the early years: Framing young children’s meaning-making with new technologies. In Understanding digital technologies and young children (pp. 18-27). Routledge.

Formby, S. (2014). Parents' Perspectives: Children's Use of Technology in the Early Years. National Literacy Trust.

Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of literacy research, 36(1), 1-30.

Gutstein, E. (2012). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. Routledge.

Hatlevik, O. E., & Christophersen, K. A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & education, 63, 240-247.

Hayes, B., James, A., Barn, R., & Watling, D. (2022). “The world we live in now”: A qualitative investigation into parents’, teachers’, and children’s perceptions of social networking site use. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 340-363.

Hughes, T. (2013). Understanding the impact of an iPad on the reading experience of struggling adolescent readers (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).

Jabr, F. (2013). The reading brain in the digital age: The science of paper versus screens. Scientific American, 11(5).

Jiang, Y., & Monk, H. (2015). Young Chinese-Australian children’s use of technology at home: Parents’ and grandparents’ views. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 10(1), 87-106.

Keim, B. (2014). Why the smart reading device of the future may be… paper. Wired (May 2014).

Kim, J. E., & Anderson, J. (2008). Mother—child shared reading with print and digital texts. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 8(2), 213-245.

Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2007). Electronic books versus adult readers: Effects on children's emergent literacy as a function of social class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 248-259.

Kucirkova, N., & Flewitt, R. (2020). Understanding parents’ conflicting beliefs about children’s digital book reading. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1468798420930361.

Linnakylä, P., & Malin, A. (2008). Finnish students' school engagement profiles in the light of PISA 2003. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 583-602.

Linnakyla, P., Malin, A., & Taube, K. (2004). Factors behind low reading literacy achievement. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 48(3), 231-249.

Mangen, A. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: haptics and immersion. Journal of research in reading, 31(4), 404-419.

Mangen, A. (2014). Evolution of Reading in the Age of Digitisation European Cooperation in the field of Scientific and Technical Research (COST IS1404 E-READ).

Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International journal of educational research, 58, 61-68.

Manuel, J., & Carter, D. (2015). Current and historical perspectives on Australian teenagers' reading practices and preferences. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, The, 38(2), 115-128.

Margolin, S. J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M. J., & Kegler, J. L. (2013). E‐readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms?. Applied cognitive psychology, 27(4), 512-519.

Ming, N. C., & Goldenberg, L. B. (2021). Research worth using:(Re) framing research evidence quality for educational policymaking and practice. Review of Research in Education, 45(1), 129-169.

Miranda, T., Williams-Rossi, D., Johnson, K. A., & McKenzie, N. (2011). Reluctant readers in middle school: Successful engagement with text using the e-reader. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 1(6).

Moody, A. K., Justice, L. M., & Cabell, S. Q. (2010). Electronic versus traditional storybooks: Relative influence on preschool children’s engagement and communication. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 294-313.

Morineau, T., Blanche, C., Tobin, L., & Guéguen, N. (2005). The emergence of the contextual role of the e-book in cognitive processes through an ecological and functional analysis. International journal of human-computer studies, 62(3), 329-348.

Parish‐Morris, J., Mahajan, N., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Collins, M. F. (2013). Once upon a time: Parent–child dialogue and storybook reading in the electronic era. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 200-211.

Picton, I. (2014). The Impact of eBooks on the Reading Motivation and Reading Skills of Children and Young People: A Rapid Literature Review. National Literacy Trust.

Picton, I. (2014). The Impact of eBooks on the Reading Motivation and Reading Skills of Children and Young People: A Rapid Literature Review. National Literacy Trust.

Pisa, O. (2010). Pisa 2009 results: Executive Summary. Accessible on webpage: http://www. oecd. org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703. pdf Retrieved, 12(09), 2014.

Schneps, M. H., Thomson, J. M., Chen, C., Sonnert, G., & Pomplun, M. (2013). E-readers are more effective than paper for some with dyslexia. PloS one, 8(9), e75634.

Shamir, A., Korat, O., & Barbi, N. (2008). The effects of CD-ROM storybook reading on low SES kindergarteners’ emergent literacy as a function of learning context. Computers & Education, 51(1), 354-367.

Strout, K. L. (2010). Average, Below Average, And Above Average First Grade Students' Beliefs about Using E-Books to Activate Interest and Motivation in Reading (Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University).

Sullivan, A., & Brown, M. (2013). Social inequalities in cognitive scores at age 16: The role of reading. CLS Working Papers, 2013(13/10).

Twist, L., Schagen, I., & Hodgson, C. (2007). Readers and Reading: The National Report for England 2006 (PIRLS: Progress in International Reading Literacy Study). National Foundation for Educational Research. The Mere, Upton Park, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 2DQ, UK.

Wästlund, E., Reinikka, H., Norlander, T., & Archer, T. (2005). Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors. Computers in human behavior, 21(2), 377-394.

Weber, C. L., & Cavanaugh, T. W. (2006). Promoting reading: Using eBooks with gifted and advanced readers. Gifted Child Today, 29(4), 56-63.

Wood, C. (2010). The impact of technology on children’s attainment in English: A review of the literature.

Wyse, D., Jones, R., Bradford, H., & Wolpert, M. A. (2018). Teaching English, language and literacy. Routledge.

 Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2016). How does ICT use influence students’ achievements in math and science over time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2431-2449.

Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2014). E-Reading Rises as Device Ownership Jumps. PewResearchCenter.

Zucker, T. A., Moody, A. K., & McKenna, M. C. (2009). The effects of electronic books on pre-kindergarten-to-grade 5 students' literacy and language outcomes: A research synthesis. Journal of educational computing research, 40(1), 47-87.

Cite this Article: