From Mechanistic Materialism Epistemology to Constructivist Epistemology: Reconstruction of Educational Perspectives
Author(s)
Dr. Shunhua Yang , Xiao huifang , Takunda Moyana ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 45-56 | Views: 123 | Downloads: 49 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8224235
Abstract
Knowledge is the core of education, and different epistemological perspectives have significant implications for educational frameworks. In China, two major perspectives that have influenced education are mechanistic materialism epistemology and constructivist epistemology. The former asserts that knowledge originates solely from object stimuli on subjects, thereby possessing objectivity, purity, uniqueness, and truth. The latter argues that knowledge emerges from the interaction between subjects and objects mediated by activities (practice), with subjects playing a decisive role in the process of understanding. Thus, knowledge not only has objectivity but also subjectivity and contextuality. It is acquired and innate, individual and social, relative and absolute. The subversion of mechanistic materialism epistemology by constructivist epistemology has led to the reconstruction of educational perspectives, providing significant impetus for educational reforms, particularly in innovative education.
Keywords
Constructivism, Mechanistic Materialism, Epistemology, Educational Perspectives
References
i. Gan Chengjun. Spiral Development of Modern Epistemology. Huabei Coal Teachers College Journal (Social Sciences Edition), 1998(4):32-35.
ii. Ren Youqun. Epistemological Foundation of Constructivist Learning Theory. In Gao Wen, Xu Binyan, Wu Gang (Eds.), Constructivist Education Research. Beijing: Education Science Press, 2008:15.
iii. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. Case Studies in Constructivist Classroom Teaching. Translated by Fan Wei. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2005:103-120.
iv. Kant, I. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Deng Xiaomang and Yang Zuta. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 2022:1,12.
v. Qian Guanghua. Kant's Category Theory. Journal of Anhui University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2001(3):1-7.
vi. Piaget, J. Genetic Epistemology. Translated by Wang Xiandian, et al. Edited by Hu Shixiang, et al. Beijing: Commercial Press, 1997:21,22.
vii. Vygotsky, L. S. Selected Works on Educational Theory (2nd Edition). Beijing: People's Education Press, 2005:32.
viii.Gao Wen. Vygotsky's Theory of Psychological Development and Social Constructivism. Foreign Educational Materials, 1999(4):10-14.
ix. Vygotsky, L. Thought and Language. Translated by Li Wei. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2021:122.
x. Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Translated by Jin Wulun, Hu Xinhe. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2021:9,148,171.
Cite this Article: