Entrepreneurial Motivation Is the Key to Success for Entrepreneur Business
Author(s)
Sheikh Farhan Ashraf , Prof Dr Cai Li , Ann Dodor , Majid Murad ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 43-60 | Views: 1590 | Downloads: 390 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3483415
Abstract
this paper is about entrepreneurial motivation and opportunities which he acquires through different entrepreneurship characteristics. In this paper a researcher highlights the already published quantitative and qualitative research studies on entrepreneurship. Now a day’s the entrepreneurial motivation and startup is the core topic in the field of entrepreneurship, so I wrote this paper for entrepreneur who needs to enhance his business and earn maximum money. Recent research on Entrepreneurship has been concentrated to a great extent on full-scale level natural powers. Malevolence to the fact analyst gets the focus with having legitimately reproached an incredible piece of the ebb and flow trial inquire about with respect to human motivation in Entrepreneurship; many scholars accept that the progression of the business theory requires thought of the motivations of people settling on entrepreneurial decisions.
Keywords
Entrepreneurship, Motivation, Opportunities, Decision Making
References
i. Ashraf, Sheikh Farhan, Cai Li, Majid Murad. (2017, December 24th). Impact of Successor’s Personality Traits on Small & Medium Enterprise (SME) Family. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research (IJMSBR), 6(12), 4-5.
ii. Aldrich, H. (2000). Organizations evolving. Beverly Hills: Sage.
iii. Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. Sexton, & R. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
iv. Babb, E. M., & Babb, S. V. (1992). Psychological traits of rural entrepreneurs. Journal of Socio-Economics, 21, 353–362.
v. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of self control. New York: Freeman.
vi. Baum, R. (1994). The Relation of Traits, Competencies, Vision, Motivation, and Strategy to Venture Growth. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
vii. Baumol, W. (1968). Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 64–71.
viii. Begley, T. M. (1995). Using founder status, age of firm, and company growth rate as the basis for distinguishing entrepreneurs form managers of smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 249–263.
ix. Begley, T. M., & Boyd, D. P. (1987). A comparison of entrepreneurs and managers of small business firms. Journal of Management, 13, 99–108.
x. Budner, S. (1982). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29–50.
xi. Busenitz, L., & Barney, J. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9–30.
xii. Carroll, G., & Mosakowski, E. (1987). The career dynamics of self-employment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 570–589.
xiii. Christiansen, C. (1997). The innovators dilemma. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
xiv. Collins, C., Locke, E., & Hanges, P. (2000). The relationship of need for achievement to entrepreneurial behavior: a meta-analysis. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
xv. Corman, J., Perles, B., & Vancini, P. (1988). Motivational factors influencing high-technology entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 26, 36–42.
xvi. Fry, F. L. (1993). Entrepreneurship: a planning approach. Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
xvii. Gartner, W. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.
xviii. Hornaday, J. A., & Aboud, J. (1973). Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs. Personnel Psychology, 24, 141–153.
xix. Johnson, B. (1990). Toward a multidimensional model of entrepreneurship: the case of achievement motivation and the entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(3), 39–54.
xx. Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: an Austrian approach. The Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60–85.
xxi. Locke, E. A. (2000a). Motivation, cognition and action: an analysis of studies of task goals and knowledge. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 408–429.
xxii. Locke, E. A. (2000b). The prime movers: traits of the great wealth creators. New York:
xxiii. AMACOM.
xxiv. Locke, E. A. (in press). Self-set goals and self-efficacy as mediators of incentives and personality. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, & H. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy. London: Erlbaum.
xxv. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
xxvi. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
xxvii. McClelland, D. C. (1965). Toward a theory of motive acquisition. American Psychologist, 20, 321–333.
xxviii. Miller, D., & Drodge, C. (1986). Psychological and traditional determinants of structure.
xxix. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 609.
xxx. Schere, J. (1982). Tolerance of ambiguity as a discriminating variable between entrepreneurs and managers. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 42, 404– 408.
xxxi. Sexton, D.L., & Bowman, N.B. (1986). Validation of a personality index: comparative psychological characteristics analysis of female entrepreneurs, managers, entrepreneurship students, and business students. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 513–528). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
xxxii. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
xxxiii. Shapero, A. (1977). The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur. Psychology Today, 9, 83– 88.
xxxiv. Tracy, K., Locke, E., & Renard, M. (1998). Conscious goal setting versus subconscious motives: longitudinal and concurrent effects on the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston, MA.
xxxv. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor’s perspective. In J. Katz, & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth, vol. 3 (pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
xxxvi. Zahra, S., & Dess, G. (2001). Entrepreneurship as a field of research: encouraging dialogue and debate. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 8–1
xxxvii. Costa, S. F., Santos, S. C., Wach, D., & Caetano, A. (2018). Recognizing Opportunities across Campus: The Effects of Cognitive Training and Entrepreneurial Passion on the Business Opportunity Prototype. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(1), 51-75.
xxxviii. Kumar, R., & Kumar, A. (2017). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship capability and its linkages towards firm performance. Global entrepreneurship and new venture creation in the sharing economy. Hershey, USA: IGI Global. pp, 12-36.
xxxix. Poblete, C. (2018). Growth expectations through innovative entrepreneurship: The role of subjective values and duration of entrepreneurial experience. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(1), 191-213.
xl. Sperber, S., & Linder, C. (2018). Gender-specifics in start-up strategies and the role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 1-14.
xli. Stahl, R. M. (2018). STATE IN THE NEOLIBERAL EPOCH.
xlii. Tur-Porcar, A., Roig-Tierno, N., & Llorca Mestre, A. (2018). Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship and Business Sustainability. Sustainability, 10(2), 452.
xliii. Zimmerer, T. W., Scarborough, N. M., & Wilson, D. (2005). Essentials of entrepreneurship and small business management: Pearson/Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Cite this Article: