Indo-Turk: Economic And Energy Dynamics
Author(s)
Hasnain Javed , Saba Fazal Firdousi , Dragana Ostic ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 52-62 | Views: 1693 | Downloads: 381 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3484196
Abstract
as soil transforms its own language into the culture, heritage, mythology, epistemology, and anthropology in a similar way, economics reflects structure and trends to shape society by interconnecting and socializing. Since the evolution of the human world, there is a tug of war between scare natural resources and societal need. But, unfortunately, conventional theories of economic growth had laid less emphasis to counter this dilemma in the context of energy as a natural resource in economic development. Despite its utmost need in both developed and developing the world. This article will reinterpret and shed light on philosophical ideas put forth by Ibn Khaldun and Katuilya Chanakya on economic growth theory for sustainable economic development. Their respective thoughts will be used as an amalgamated tool for proposing an economic and energy dynamic model for integrated Indo-Turk relationships in the long run. Ibn Khaldun theory of economic development addressed the economics of humanism and justice in contrast to Katuilya presented science of material gain that societies can achieve by having strong administrative control. All the economic dimensions by Ibn Khaldun were given as participant observer who was later used by Classical, Neo-Classical and Keynesian economists as main ingredients in formulating their refine economic growth models. On the other hand, Katuilya presented peripheral idealism to govern a state being a neutral deprived observer in an imaginative state of the world. Thus, both these interrelated intellectual thoughts help in sketching a conceptual framework based on humanistic and sustainable economic and energy development growth model along with affirmative policy implications for fruitful Indo-Turkic relationships. This paper summed up by doing a comparative and critical analysis of economic and energy dynamic models applied in other economies followed by recommendations and conclusion.
Keywords
Integrated economic growth, Economics of humanism, Science of material gain,Energy dynamics.
References
i. All-India Congress Committee Resolution VIII, Ahmedabad, 1921, cited in Verinder Grover (ed.), International Relations and Foreign Policy of India, Vol. I, New Delhi, Deep & Deep Publications, 1992, p. 80.
ii. Azmi Özcan, Pan-Islamism: Indian Muslims, the Ottomans and Britain, 1877-1924, Leiden, Brill, 1997, p. 1.
iii. Barry Rubin and Kemal Kirisci (eds.), Turkey in World Politics: An Emerging Multiregional Power, London, Lynne Rienner, Publishers,2001.
iv. Braibanti, Ralph and Joseph J. Spengler, (1963) eds Administration and Economic Development in India, Durham NC: Duke University Press.
v. British Petroleum (BP) report in Turkish Daily News, 21 June 2008; David Tonge, “Turkey’s Energy Sector under Stress”, IBS Research & Consultancy, March 2007.
vi. Chand, Devi (1982), The Atharvaved, New Delhi, India: Munshriam Manohartal Publishers.
vii. Choudhary, Radhakrishna. (1971) Kautilya’s Political Ideas and Institutions, Varanasi, India: Chowkhambra Sanskrit Studies Office.
viii. Chapra, M. U. (2008). Ibn Khaldun's theory of development: Does it help explain the low performance of the present-day Muslim world?. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(2), 836-863
ix. Charles Issawi, An Arab Philosophy of History, Selections from the Prolegomena of Ibn Khaldun of Tunis (1332-1406) (London: John Murray, 1950), p. 337-338.
x. Dasgupta, Ajit K. (1993), A History of Indian Economic Thought, London, England: Routledge.
xi. Devendra Kaushik, “Overcoming the Colonial and Geographic Barrier: India’s Traditional Relationship with Central Asia” in N. N.Vohra (ed.), Culture, Society and Politics in Central Asia and India, New Delhi, Shipra Publications, 1999, pp. 143-152.
xii. Didem Mersin Alıcı, “The Role of Culture, History and Language in Turkish national Identity- building: An Overemphasis on Central Asian Roots”, Central Asian Survey, Vol. 15 (2), 1996, pp. 228-230.
xiii. George Perkovich, “Is India A Major Power?”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 27 (1), Winter 2003/2004, pp. 131-132.
xiv. Khaldun, I. (1967). The Muqaddimah, trans. F. Rosenthal, 3, 118.
xv. Mitchell, B. (1994). Sustainable development at the village level in Bali, Indonesia. Human Ecology, 22(2), 189-211.
xvi. Ruchita Beri, “Traditional and Non-Traditional Threats in a Changing Global Order: An Indian Perspective”, Paper Presented at Center for Policy Studies International Seminar on ‘IBSA Within a Changing Global Order: Regional and Human Security Dimensions’ held in Johannesburg, South Africa, 29-30 June 2006, p. 1, Retrieved 21 October 2011 from
xvii. Shamasastry, R. (1956) Kautilya’s Arthashastra, 8th ed., Mysore, India: Mysore Printing and Publishing House.
xviii. Soner Çağaptay, “Startup of the Baku-Tibilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: Turkey’s Energy Role”, Policy Watch, No. 998, 27 May 2005.
xix.Sophia Aguirre, M. (2002). Sustainable development: why the focus on population?. International Journal of Social Economics, 29(12), 923-945.
xx. Stephen Blank, “India’s Energy Offensive in Central Asia”, Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, 09 March 2005.
xxi. Spengler, Joseph J (1971) Indian Economic Thought, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
xxii. Türkkaya Ataöv, “Historical and Cultural Ties between India and Turkey:Turkish View”, in Türkkaya Ataöv (ed.), Indo-Turkish Symposium on the 50th Anniversary of India’s Independence and Turkish-Indian Diplomatic Relations, Ankara, Centre for Strategic Research, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1997, pp. 70-71.
xxiii. Rahman Farooqi, Mughal-Ottoman Relations: A Study of Political & Diplomatic Relations between Mughal India and the OttomanEmpire, 1556-1748, Delhi, Jayyad Press, 1989.
xxiv. Yasheng Huang and Tarun Khanna, “Can India Overtake China?”, Foreign Policy, Vol. 83 (4), July/August 2003, pp. 74-81.
xxv. Ziya Öniş, “Turkey in the Post-Cold War Era: In Search of Identity”, Middle East Journal, Vol. 40 (1), Winter 1995, pp. 54-58.
Cite this Article: