Corporate Governance and its Relation with the Performance of Firms Listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange

Author(s)

Download Full PDF Pages: 73-84 | Views: 1287 | Downloads: 349 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3490073

Volume 7 - November 2018 (11)

Abstract

Corporate governance is an important concept known for the growth of firms; the purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between the performances and governance of corporations listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Corporate governance is judged through the size of the board, CEO and chairman duality, a number of NED’s and a number of NED’s out of total directors in audit committee while the performance of firms is calculated through ‘Return of Assets (ROA)’ and ‘Earnings gained per Share (EPS).’ For this purpose, secondary data is used and taken from 25 companies listed at PSX. The data collected for a period of 5 years from (2013-2017) and quantitative technique is used for data analysis. The results of the study revealed that there exists a significant relationship between the performance of firms (ROA &EPS) and corporate governance mechanisms except for CEO & chairman composition. On the other hand, the results of Johansen’s co-integration test concluded that there is long run integration between the firm’s performance and their governance. VECM disclosed that there exists recombination of co-integration between governance and firm performance after some disturbance, except Audit Committee NED’s proportion. Granger causality test concluded the significant cause of CEO/Chairman duality on firm’s performance rather other three corporate governance mechanisms. It is recommended that companies need to focus on CEO and chairman composition factor for enhancing performance.

Keywords

Board size, CEO/chairman composition, Non-Executive Directors, Audit Committee, VECM (Vector Error Correction Model)

References

i. Abdullah, S. N. (2004). Board composition, CEO duality and performance among Malaysian listed companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society , 4 (4), 47-61.

ii. Aggarwal, E. R., Stulz, R. M., & Williamson, &. R. (2007). Do US firms have the best corporate governance? A cross-country examination of the relation between corporate governance and shareholder wealth. National Bureau of Economic Research.

iii. Andres, P. D., & Vallelado, &. E. (2008). Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking and Finance , 32 (12), 2570-2580.

iv. Arora, A., & Sharma, &. C. (2016). Corporate governance and firm performance in developing countries: Evidence from India. Corporate Governance , 16 (2), 420-436.

v. Aslam, S., Ahmad, M., Amin, S., Usman, M., & Arif, &. S. (2018). The impact of corporate governance and intellectual capital on firm's performance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from Australian listed companies. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences , 12 (1), 283-308.

vi. Black, B. S., & Bhagat, &. S. (2002). The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law , 27 (2), 231-273.

vii. Black, B. S., Jang, H., & Kim, &. W. (2006). Does Corporate Governance Predict Firms' Market Values? Evidence from Korea. The Journal of Law Economics and Organization , 22 (1), 366-413.

viii. Boumosleh, A. (2005). Director compensation and board effectiveness. FMA Annual Meeting.

ix. Brown, L. D., & Caylor, &. M. (2004). Corporate governance and firm performance.

x. Charlie, W., & David, &. L. (2000). The performance-governance relationship: The effects of Cadbury compliance on UK quoted companies. Journal of Management and Governance , 4 (4), 265-281.

xi. Christensen, J., Kent, P., Routledge, J., & Stewart, &. J. (2015). Do corporate governance recommendations improve the performance and accountability of small listed companies? Accounting and Finance , 55 (1), 133-164.

xii. Coleman, A. K., Adjasi, C. K., & Abor, &. J. (2007). Corporate Governance and firm performance: Evidence from Ghanaian listed companies. Corporate Ownership of Control , 4 (2), 123-133.

xiii. Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, &. M. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics , 48 (8), 35-54.

xiv. Fernandez, M. R. (2015). Social Responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. Business Research Quarterly , 19 (2), 137-151.

xv. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, &. A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 118 (1), 107-156.

xvi. Gul, S., Sajid, M., Razzaq, N., & Afzal, &. F. (2012). Agency cost, corporate governance and ownership structure (the case of Pakistan). International Journal of Business and Social Science , 3 (9), 268-278.

xvii. Hassan, Y. (2017). Does audit committee substitute or complement other corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence from an emerging economy. Managerial Auditing Journal , 32 (7), 658-681.

xviii. Hermawan, A. A. (2011). The influence of effective board of commissioners and audit committee on the informativeness of earnings: Evidence from Indonesian Listed firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance , 2 (1), 1-38.

xix. Jaggi, B., Allini, A., Macchioni, R., & Zampella, &. A. (2018). Do investors find carbon information useful? Evidence from Italian firms. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting , 50 (4), 1031-1056.

xx. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The journal of Finance , 48 (3), 831-880.

xxi. Kajola, & O, &. S. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance: The case of Nigerian listed firms. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences , 1 (14), 17-28.

xxii. Kajola, S. O. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance: The case of Nigerian listed firms. European Journal of Economics, Finance, and Administrative Sciences , 1 (14), 16-28.

xxiii. Kato, T., & Long, &. C. (2006). Executive compensation, firm performance, and corporate governance in China: Evidence from firms listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges. Economic Development and Cultural Change , 54 (4), 845-983.

xxiv. Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board Composition and Corporate Performance: how the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance An International Law , 11 (3), 189-205.

xxv. Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2004). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance , 10 (5), 703-728.

xxvi. Kukah, M. A., Amidu, M., & Abor, &. J. (2016). Corporate governance mechanisms and accounting information quality of listed firms in Ghana. African J. Accounting, Auditing and Finance , 5 (1), 38-58.

xxvii. Mak, Y., & Kusnadi, &. Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific Basin Finance Journal , 13 (3), 301-318.

xxviii. Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, &. A. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal , 57 (6), 1681-1705.

xxix. Mishra, S., & Mohanty, P. (2014). Corporate governance as a value driver for firm performance: Evidence from India. Corporate Governance , 14 (2), 265-280.

xxx. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, &. R. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics , 20 (5), 293-315.

xxxi. Ramli, J. A., & Ramli, M. I. (2016). Corporate governance and corporate performance of Malaysian companies: Examining from an islamic perspective. Procedia Economics and Finance , 35 (2), 146-155.

xxxii. Ruback, R. S., & Jensen, &. M. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics , 11 (5), 5-50.

xxxiii. Salim, M., & Dr., &. R. (2012). Capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian listed companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 65 (3), 156-166.

xxxiv. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics , 40 (2), 185-211.

Cite this Article:

Syed Musawar Hussain, Corporate Governance and its Relation with the Performance of Firms Listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange, International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research 11(2018):73-84 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3490073