Corporate Governance and Deposit Money Banks Performance in Nigeria

Author(s)

Osuji Casmir Chinemerem ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 33-39 | Views: 1509 | Downloads: 376 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3490370

Volume 8 - January 2019 (01)

Abstract

this study examined the influence of corporate governance on the financial performance of banks in Nigeria. The specific objective of the study is to examine the influence of corporate governance on the financial performance of banks. Bank performance was used as a dependent variable during Board size, Board composition. Gender diversity and Number of audit meetings were used as independent variables; profit after tax was used as a proxy to measure performance. The study adopted the ex-post facto as its research design while the secondary data was used sourcing its data from the annual report of banks for fifteen years (2003-2017). The student t-test, f-test, coefficient of determination and Pearson correlation were the statistical tools used in testing the significance of the variables and the model. The findings revealed that all the independent variables have a significant influence on the dependent variable through the Pearson correlation result revealed that Audit meeting, Board composition, and Gender diversity have a positive relationship while board size has a negative relationship with banks financial performance. The study conclusively agreed that corporate governance have an existing influence of money deposit bank banks performance and therefore we recommend that discretion of rules among the directors should be specified and democratically practiced within the banking rules.

Keywords

Corporate governance, Deposit Money Banks, Performance, Profitability, Diversity

References

                        i.            Anaroke, K. (2014). 25 billion capital base: What hopes for banks? Retrieved on 24 August2009from http://www.vanguardngr.com/articles/2004/Business.html.

      ii.            Bahgat, S. and Bolton, B., (2014). Board ownership and corporate governance indices: Draft Programme for ECGTN Workshop and Symposium on Contractual Corporate Governance. University of Colorado at Boulder: United States.

    iii.            Basley, K., and Clover, H., (2016). Research methodology on behavioural Sciences, Lagos:Longman press.

     iv.            Berle, A., and Means, G.C., (2016). The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Macmillan, New York, NY.

       v.            Carse, D., (2017). Speech: The importance of corporate governance in banks. Retrived May, 2011.website:http//www.infor.gov.hk/hkmalenglspeeches.

     vi.            Clarkson, M.E., (2016). “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance,” Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.

   vii.            Conyon, M.J., and Peck, S.1., (2015). “Board size and corporate performance: evidence from European countries”, The European Journal of Finance, 4,291-304.

 viii.            Cornwall, L. and Shopiro, I, (2016).New Developments in Banking and Finance. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

     ix.            Donaldson, L. (2017). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64.

       x.            Fama, H., and Jensen, R. (2014). Contract cost and financing decision. Journal of Business. 30 (1)71-91.

     xi.            Jensen, M. C (2013). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance and take over. AmericanEconomic Review 76:323-330

   xii.            Klein, P., Shapiro D., and Young, J. (2014). Corporate governance family Ownership and firm value: The Canadian evidence. Simon Fraser University working Paper

 xiii.            Kwakwa V., and Nzekwu, G. (2013).“International Best Practice on Corporate Governance” Issues in Corporate Governance. 0. Mo (ed).

 xiv.            Lemo, H. (2012). The impact of corporate strategy on capital structure of Australian companies.Managerial and Decision Economics 15; 245- 253.

   xv.            Lipton, M., and Lorsch, J. (2012).A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59-77.

 xvi.            Love, I., Rachinsky, A. (2013). Corporate Governance, Ownership and Bank Performance in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Russia and Ukraine, Available online at http://siteresource.worldbank.org/DEC/Resources/Corporate_Governance_ Ownership_and_Bank_Performance.pdf.

xvii.            Mizrichi, M., (2016).Berle and Means revisited: the governance and power of large U.S. corporations. USA: University of Michigan publications.

xviii.            Mueller, D. (2017). The Anglo-Saxon approach to corporate governance and its applicability to emerging markets. Corporate Governance: An international Review, 14(4), 207-219.

 xix.            Myers, J. (2012). Determinants of corporate borrowing.Journal of Financial Economics. 5 (5)147-175.

   xx.            Nzekwu L. (2015). Nigerian banks: signs of life. The African Report Magazine 17: 64-66.

 xxi.            Nzotta, S. M., (2012). Money, banking and finance: theory and practice. Owerri: Hudson - Jude Nigeria publishers.

xxii.            Ogbeche, G. (2012). Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: A theoretical integration and empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 12:1-15.

xxiii.            Pandey, I. M (2015). Financial management New Dethi: Vikas Publishing House.

xxiv.            Pathan (2014). Board size, independence and performance: An analysis of that banks. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 14(3), 211-227.

xxv.            Sanda, A.U., A.S., Mikailu and Garba, T., (2013).“Corporate governance mechanisms and firm financial performance in Nigeria”, AERC Research Paper 149, Nairobi.

Cite this Article: