Building Corporate Reputation through Corporate Social Responsibility

Author(s)

Thi Thu Hoai Pham , Long Hoang Tran ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 154-161 | Views: 1048 | Downloads: 313 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3491650

Volume 8 - March 2019 (03)

Abstract

The objective of the article is to test the impact of corporate social responsibility on the corporate reputation. Based on survey data of 389 Vietnamese textile enterprises, the results show that CSR positively affects corporate reputation. At the same time, the impact of CSR on corporate reputation in enterprises is much stronger than that of small and medium enterprises. Since then, we recommend that Vietnamese textile enterprises should implement CSR to improve corporate reputation and improve the firm’s performance

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility, the reputation of Vietnamese enterprises and textiles.

References

        i.            Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman: University of Iowa Press.

      ii.            Bradley. (2012). Use of advance directives by South Australians: results from the Health Omnibus Survey Spring 2012. MJA, 201, 467-469 doi:10.5694/mja13.00175

    iii.            Cadez. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches (Vol. 30).

     iv.            Camps, J., & Luna-Arocas, R. (2012). A Matter of Learning: How Human Resources Affect Organizational Performance. British Journal of Management, 23(1), 1-21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00714.x

       v.            Carroll. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. doi:10.2307/257850

     vi.            Carroll. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct (Vol. 38).

   vii.            Carroll. (2000). Ethical challengs for business in the new millennium : orporate social responsibility and models of management movality. Business Ethics Quately, 10, 33-42.

 viii.            Carroll. (2003). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Cengage Learning, Stamford.

     ix.            Chen, l., Feldmann, A., & Tang, O. (2015). The relationship between disclosure of corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from GRI reports in manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, 445–456. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.04.004

       x.            Chin. (1996). A Partial Least Square Latent Variable Modelling Approach for Measuring interaction.

     xi.            Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G.A. Marcoulides (Ed.). Modern methods for business research, 295-336.

   xii.            Choi, J.-S., Kwak, Y.-M., & Choe, C. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from Korea (Vol. 35).

 xiii.            Clarkson. (1995). A framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.

 xiv.            Cochran, P. L. (2007). The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 50(6), 449-454.

   xv.            Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42-56. doi:10.2307/255956

 xvi.            Coleman. (2007). Women-owned firms and growth. Journal of Business & Entrepreneurship, 19(2), 31-44.

xvii.            Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560. doi:10.2307/20159780

xviii.            Coombs, J. E., & Gilley, K. M. (2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 827-840. doi:10.1002/smj.476

 xix.            Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13. doi:10.1002/csr.132

   xx.            Darlington. (1990). Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.

 xxi.            Davis, K. (1960). Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), 70–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166246

xxii.            Dollinger .M.J, G. P. A. (1992). Interorganizational and collective strategies in small firms: Environmental effects and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 18 (4), 695-715.

xxiii.            Donaldson, T. a. P., L. . (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.

xxiv.            Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46, 1059–1074. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.8.1059.12030

xxv.            Drews, M. (2010). Measuring the business and societal benefits of corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 10(4), 421-431. doi:10.1108/14720701011069650

xxvi.            Fauzi, H. (2009). Corporate Social and Environmental Performance: A Comparative Study of Indonesian Companies and Multinational Companies (MNCs) Operating in Indonesia (Vol. 6).

xxvii.            Fauzi, H., & Idris, K. M. . (2009). The Relationship of CSR and Financial Performance: New Evidence from Indonesian Companies. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 3(1), 66-87.

xxviii.            Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy (Vol. 33).

xxix.            Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452. doi:10.2307/3151718

xxx.            Frederick, W. C. (1960). The Growing Concern over Business Responsibility. California Management Review, 2(4), 54-61. doi:10.2307/41165405

xxxi.            Freedman, M. J., B. . (1982). Pollution Disclosures, Pollution Performance and Economic Performance. Omega, 10, 167-176. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(82)90051-2

xxxii.            Freeman. (1984). Strategic management : A Stakeholder Approach: Pitman,Boston,MA.

xxxiii.            Galbreath, J. (2010). How does corporate social responsibility benefit firms? Evidence from Australia. European Business Review, 22(4), 411-431.

xxxiv.            Hair. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2).

xxxv.            Hair J. F. J., H., G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M.  . (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Vol. 46).

xxxvi.            Harirson J. S., W. A. (2013 ). Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97-125. doi:10.5840/beq20132314

xxxvii.            Harris, L. C. (2001). Market orientation and performance: objective and subjective empirical evidence from UK companies. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 17-43.

xxxviii.            Hasan, I., Kobeissi, N., & Wang, H. . (2018 ). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Productivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 671 - 688.

xxxix.            Henri, J. F., & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, organization and society, 35, 63–80. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.02.001

     xl.            Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & R. Sinkovics, R. (2009). The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-319).

   xli.            Lopez, V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (Vol. 75).

 xlii.            Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. doi:10.2307/258632

xliii.            Luo, X. a. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value. Journal of Marketing, 70 (4), 1-18. doi:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2260523

xliv.            Lys, T., Naughton, J. P., & Wang, C. (2015). Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 56-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.03.001

 xlv.            Mahoney, L. a. R., R. W. (2007). Corporate social performance, Financial performance and Insitiutional Ownership in Canadian Firms. Accounting Forum. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2007.05.001

xlvi.            Makin, C. F., and Francois Bellavance. (2007). Causality Between Corporate social performance and financial performance : Evidence from Canadian Firms. Business Ethics, 89, 409-422.

xlvii.            Makni, R. F., C. & Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 409-422.

xlviii.            Man. (2011). Entrepreneurial competencies and the performance of small and medium enterprises in the Hong Kong services sector. Unpublished PhD thesis, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

xlix.            Margolis J. D., W., J. P. . (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.

        l.            Marom. (2006). Toward a unified theory of the CSP–CFP link. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 191–200.

      li.            McClure, J., Spry, J., & Coelho, P. (2005). The Social Responsibility of Corporate Management: A Classical Critique (Vol. 18).

    lii.            McCracken. (2001). Measuring organizational performance in the hospital industry: an exploratory comparison of objective and subjective methods. Health Services Management Research, 14(4), 211-219. doi:10.1258/0951484011912717

  liii.            McGuire. (1988). Corporate socail respolnsibility and firm fimamcial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 854-872.

   liv.            McWilliam, S. (2000). Corporate responsibility and financial performance : Correlation or misspecification ? Strateg. Manag. J, 21, 603-609.

     lv.            McWilliams, A. a. S., D. . (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.

   lvi.            Miles, M., & covin. (2000). Miles, M., & Covin, J. (2000). “Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational, Competitive, and Financial Advantage,” Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3): 299-311 (Vol. 23).

 lvii.            Milne, M. J., & Hackston, D. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77-108. doi:10.1108/09513579610109987

lviii.            Mintzberg, H. (1983). The case for corporate social responsibility. journal of Business Strategy, 4(2), 3 - 15.

   lix.            Mishra S. Suar D.  [Journal]. - [s.l.] :  , -. V. D. (2010). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Firm Performance of Indian Companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 571–601. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0441-1

     lx.            Mullerat. (2010). International Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Corporations in the Economic Order of the 21st Century. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn.

   lxi.            Murillo D., L., J. M. . (2006). SMEs and CSR: An approach to CSR in their own words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 227–240.

 lxii.            Nakiyingi. (2012). Managerial competence, access to credit and business success. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Makerere University.

Cite this Article: