The Impact of Procurement Practices Encapsulating Planning, Policy and Sustainability on Service Delivery: VRA, Ghana as the Converging Dot.
Author(s)
Aphu Elvis Selase , Afenya Millicent Selase ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 169-186 | Views: 716 | Downloads: 226 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3613411
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the impact of procurement policy, procurement planning and sustainable procurement on service delivery. The study employed a quantitative research approach and an explanatory design. The target population for the study was the staff and management of the Volta River Authority. A structured questionnaire was used to gather primary data. The study used SPSS version 32.0 for the data analyses. The study found that 73.6% of variations in service delivery were explained by Procurement Policy, Procurement Planning and Sustainable Procurement. The study found that Procurement Policy (β = 0.623 ρ=0.000< 0.05) are significant determinants of service delivery thus a unit change in procurement policy will result in a 62.3% change in service delivery. Procurement Planning (β = 0.027, ρ=0.080< 0.05) are significant determinants of service delivery thus a unit change in procurement planning will result in a 2.7% change in service delivery. Sustainable Procurement (β = 0.39 ρ=0.000 < 0.05) are a significant determinant of service delivery. Thus a unit change in Sustainable Procurement will result in a 39% change in service delivery. From the model estimation, procurement policy was the strongest predictor of service delivery followed by sustainable procurement and lastly procurement planning. The study revealed a strong significant positive correlation between procurement policy and service delivery. Moreover, the result showed a strong significant positive correlation between procurement planning and service delivery. Again the study found a significant positive correlation between sustainable procurement and service delivery. The study concludes that Procurement Policy, Procurement Planning and Sustainable Procurement significantly predict service delivery of VRA. The study recommends that the management of VRA must continuously invest in sustainable procurement, procurement planning and procurement policy to enhance service delivery to the public.
Keywords
Procurement Practices, procurement planning, procurement policy, Sustainable Procurement, Service Delivery
References
i. Anderson, L. (2011). Research in Education. Sydney: Allen Unwin.
ii. Basheka, B. C. and Bisangabasaija, E. (2010). Determinants of unethical public procurement in local government systems of Uganda: a case study. Int. J. Procurement Management, 3(1), 91-104.
iii. Davis, M. J. (2014). Procurement Practices Influencing Service Delivery: A Case of Kenya Power. European Journal of Logistics Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, Vol. 2 No. (3), pp. 79-137.
iv. ESMAP (UNDP/World Bank Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme). (2002a).
v. Government Accountability Office (2005). Framework for Assessing the Acquisition Function at Federal Agencies (GAO-05-218G). Washington, DC: Author. Government of Uganda (2006). The Local Government (Amendments) Act, 2006. Kampala, Uganda: Author.
vi. Ghana Integrity Initiative, (2007). Quarterly Newsletter, Issue Number 23 - December,
vii. Huber, D. (2008). ''Sample size in research''. New York: The Free Press.
viii. Hussein, I. M. R. & Shale, I. N. (2014). Effects of sustainable procurement practices on organisational performance in manufacturing sector in Kenya: a case of Unilever Kenya Limited. European Journal of Business Management, 1 (11), 417-438
ix. Kothari, R.C. (2008). Research Methodology; Methods and Techniques. 2nd edition, New Age International Publishers; New Delhi.
x. Leni W., Victoria C., Maia K., and Dan H., (2012). Common constraints and incentive problems in service delivery. Overseas Development Institute.111 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7JD. UK.www.odi.org.uk.
xi. Mullins, D.R., (2003). Accountability and Coordination in a Decentralized Context: Institutional, Fiscal and Governance Issues. Washington, DC: American University.
xii. Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G., (2003). Research methods: Quantitative & qualitative approaches. Nairobi: African Centre for Technology Studies.
xiii. Nichols, P. (2002). Regulating Transnational Bribery in Times of Globalization and Fragmentation. The Yale Journal of Internal law, 24(1), 257-304.
xiv. Oboth, M. J. (2001). Decentralization and service delivery: Constraints and controversies. Kampala: Makerere University Library
xv. Organization Economy Corporation Development-Development Assistance Commssion (2006). Methodology for Assessment of National Procurement Systems. Paris, France: OECD.
xvi. Preuss, L. (2009). Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: the Case of local government, supply chain management, Vol.14 No.3, p.213
xvii. Prier, E., & McCue, C. P. (2009). “The Implications of a Muddled Definition of Public Procurement.” Journal of Public Procurement, 9(3&4): 326–370
xviii. Sarhaye, A. S. & Marendi, N. P. (2017). Role of green procurement on organisational performance of manufacturing firms in Kenya: A case of coca cola company. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, Vol. 4, Iss. 3(7), pp. 85-102
xix. Trionfetti, F. (2000). "Discriminatory public procurement and international trade", World Economy, Vol. 23 No.1, pp.57-76
xx. World Bank (1995a). Guidelines: Procurement under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits, World Bank, Washington, D.C. World Bank Country Procurement Assessment Report, (2001).
xxi. Yamane, Taro. 1967. Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row.
xxii. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: design and methods’, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol.5, London, Sage Publications.
Cite this Article: