The Relative Effectiveness Of Monetary And Fiscal Policies On Economic Activity In Zimbabwe (1981: 4 – 1998: 3) “An Error Correction Approach

Author(s)

Chingarande Anna ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 92-127 | Views: 378 | Downloads: 100 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3384466

Volume 1 - May 2012 (05)

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of monetary and fiscal policies on economic activity in Zimbabwe by employing a modified St Louis equation for the period 1981:4 to 1998:3. The main objective is to determine the relative effectiveness of monetary and fiscal policies on the economic growth process in Zimbabwe using the new econometric techniques of time series, cointegration and error correction approach. Secondary data was collected from various publications like, Government of Zimbabwe (1987) : Annual Economic Review of Zimbabwe, Central Statistical Office (1998) National Accounts 1985-97 and Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (various issues) monthly and quarterly bulletins. Quarterly data was used to make a total of 68 observations. LIMDEP Version 6.0 and PC GIVE Version 8 packages were used for data analysis. The regression results suggest that the monetary influence is relatively stronger and more predictable than fiscal policy in determining economic activity. These results suggest that monetary policy can be relied on as a successful macroeconomic stabilization tool in Zimbabwe. Fiscal policy should be streamlined as it is found to have an insignificant impact on economic activity in Zimbabwe. The impulse dummies which are included in the model in order to reduce the impact of outliers in the scaled residuals were also found to be significant. These impulse dummies are for the period when Zimbabwe experienced severe drought and also a bumper harvest. Exports had an insignificant impact on economic activity. The estimated equations are found to exhibit structural stability implying their usefulness for the purpose of forecasting and policy analysis. Money supply is found to be consistent with economic theory, having monetary base as the most important variable. 

Keywords

 Monetary policy, Fiscal policy, Economic activity.

References

                     i.            Agha A. I. and Khan M. S. (2006) “An Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Imbalances and Inflation”.

                   ii.            Ajayi S. I. (1974) An Econometric Case Study of the Relative Importance of Monetary and Fiscal Policy in Nigeria, Bangladesh Economic Review, Vol 2.

                  iii.            Akcay O. C., Alper C.E. and S. Ozmucur S. (2001) “Budget Deficit, Inflation and Debt”.

                 iv.            Becketti S. & Morris C. (1992) Does Money Still Forecast Economic Activity? Economic Review: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City , Second Quarter 2.

                   v.            Blanchard O. V (1990) Why Does Money Affect Output? In Handbook of Monetary Economics, edited by Friedman B. and Hann F. Amsterdam: North Holland.

                 vi.            Brunner K. & Meltzer A. H. (1993) Money Supply, Friedman B.M and Hann F.H(eds)Handbook of Monetary Economics Vol 11 ;page 358-397,Elservier Science Publishers B.V Amsterdam.

                vii.            Buchler A.G (1974) Government Finance in a Stable Economy, Annals.

              viii.            Byone A.J (1994) Monetary and Fiscal Influences in Economic Activity in African Countries, African Review of Monetary and Banking, a Supplementary Issue of Savings and Development Vol ½ pp 97-108.

                 ix.            Chetty V.K & Lahiri A.K On The Effectiveness of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in a Keynesian Model.

                   x.            Chowdhury A.R (1988) Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy and Aggregate Economic Activity: Some Further Evidence, Department of Economics, Bently College, Waltham, MA 02254, USA.

                 xi.            Chowdhury, A.R. (1986). Monetary and Fiscal Impacts on Economic Activities in Bangladesh A Note. The Bangladesh Development Studies. Vol. XIV, No. 2. 101-106.

                xii.            Chrystal K.A. Price S (1994) Controversies in Macroeconomics, 3rd Edition, British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data, Great Britain.

              xiii.            Corrigan E.(1970) The Measurement and Importance of Fiscal Changes, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Review, Vol 52. Countries?”, BIS Working Papers 174, Bank for International Settlements

              xiv.            Darrat A.F. (1984) The Dominant Influence of Fiscal Actions in Developing Countries, Eastern Economic Journal, 10, 271-84.

               xv.            De-Leeuw F. & Gramlich M. (1969)The Channels of Monetary Policy, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review.

              xvi.            De-Leeuw F. & Kalchbrenner J (1969) Monetary and Fiscal Actions: A Test of the Relative Importance of Economic Stabilisation – A Comment. Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review.

            xvii.            Delorme C.D & Ekelund R.B (1983) Macroeconomics, Business Publications Inc, United States of America.

           xviii.            Eisner R. (1969) Fiscal and Monetary Policy Reconsidered, American Economic Review Vol LVIII Number 1.

              xix.            Fazli R. & Waliullah. Effectiveness of Monetary Policy in Pakistan: Empirical Evidences based on Bound Test Approach, International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 1; January 2011in Pakistan”, SBP Research Bulletin 2 (2).

               xx.            Friedman M & Mieselman H. (1963) The Relative Stability of Monetary Velocity and Investment Multiplier in the United States 1897-1957, in Commission in Money, Credit and Stabilisation Policies, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall Publishers.

              xxi.            Friedman M. (1948) Monetary and Fiscal Framework for Economic Stability, American Economic Review, Vol 38.

            xxii.            Friedman M. (1969) The Role of Monetary Policy,The American Economic Review Vol LVIII Number 1.

           xxiii.            Ghatak S. (1983) Monetary Economics in Developing Countries. The English Language Book Society, London.

          xxiv.            Government of Zimbabwe (1998) Medium Term Plan 1998-2000, National Economic Planning Commission.

            xxv.            Government of Zimbabwe (2010) Medium Term Plan 2011-2015, Ministry of Finance and Economic Development.

          xxvi.            Granger C.W. and Newbold P. (1974) Spurious Regressions in Econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, 26, 1054-66

         xxvii.            Granger C.W.J. (1969) Investigating Causal Relationship: Econometrica, Vol 37 No 3: pp174-189

       xxviii.            Lambertini L. and Rovelli R. (2003) “Monetary and Fiscal Policy Coordination and Macroeconomic stabilization: A Theoretical Analysis”, Working Papers 464, Dipartimento

          xxix.            Muhammad Nasir, Afaque Ahmad, Amanat Ali & Faiz-Ur-Rehman (2010) Fiscal and Monetary Policy Coordination: Evidence from Pakistan International Research Journal of Finance and Economics ISSN 1450-2887 Issue 35 (2010)

            xxx.            Olaloye, A. O. and Ikhide, S. I. (1995) Economic Sustainability and the Role of Fiscal and Monetary Policies in A Depressed Economy: The Case Study of Nigeria. Sustainable Development, Vol. 3. 89-100.

          xxxi.            Senbet D.(2011) The Relative Impact of Fiscal versus Monetary Actions on Output: A Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Approach Business and Economics Journal, Vol 2011: BEJ-25

         xxxii.            Ubogu R.E.(1985) Potency of Monetary and Fiscal Policy Instruments on Economic Activities of African Countries, University of Lagos, Nigeria

       xxxiii.            Zoli E. (2005) “How Does Fiscal Policy Affect Monetary Policy in Emerging Market Sustainability: Evidence from Turkey (1970-2000)”, Working Paper Series, Department of Countries?”, BIS Working Papers 174, Bank for International Settlements. Economics, Bogazici University, Istanbul.

Cite this Article: