The effect of institutional quality on environmental performance (With emphasis on the Iran’s economy)

Author(s)

Ziari-Reza , Ziari-Reza ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 60-68 | Views: 387 | Downloads: 106 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3406027

Volume 2 - April 2013 (04)

Abstract

Today’s environment economic is important. Improving environmental performance On the one hand, requires knowledge of environmental threats to communities and on the other hand presents new approaches need to be developed to ensure environmental sustainability. Seems to be more research into the environmental quality of the affected communities has been neglected the quality of institutions in environmental protection. Institutional environment, one of the most important elements of the institutional framework - a structure that forms an economic system. An economic system based on the institutional environment is formed and maintained. The institutional environment - which consists of a set of institutions - state and market rules provide for a mechanism in addition to the structural relationships between entities in the economic system. This approach is economics, institutional support, and the use of recently developed measures of institutional quality (IQ), to evaluate the environmental performance of the selected countries, in result of this research implies that development of institutions in different countries, and the important factor is the sensitivity of communities to environmental quality. 

Keywords

Institutional quality, environmental performance

References

  1. Alam, s., F.Ambreen & B. Muhammad, (2007). Sustainable Development in Pakistan in the context of energy Consumption Demand and Environmental Degradation. Journal of Asian Economics 18:825-837.
  2. Ang, j.B. (2007). CO2 emission, Energy consumption, and output in france. Energy policy, 35:4772-4778.
  3. Baltagi, B. H. (1995). Economic Analysis of Panel Data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc New York, USA.
  4. Cole, M.A., Rayner, a.j., Bates, j.M., (1997). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Empirical Analysis. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 401-416.
  5. Economic freedom of the world annual report, (2010)
  6. Egli, H.and T.M.steger (2007). A dynamic model of the environmental Kuznets Curve: turning point and public policy, environmental & resource Economics, 36 (1) :15-34.
  7. Frankel, j.A.and Rose, A. (2005). IS Trade good or bad for the Environment? Sorting out the casality; the review of Economic and statictics, 87, 85-91.
  8. Fraser Institution, Economic freedom of the world, (2010).
  9. Friedl, B. and M. Getzner (2003). Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecological Economics. 45(1):133-148.
  10. Galeotti, M. Lanza, A. and paulic, E. (2005). reassessing The Environmental Kuznets Curve CO2 emissions: A robustness exercise; ecological Economics,
  11. Glaser, E. L., LaPorta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2004). Do Institutions Cause Growth? Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. ٩, 271-303.
  12. Grossman, G.E. and A.B Krueger (1995). Economic growth and the Environment, Quarterly journal of Economics, CX (2):353-377.
  13. Gwartney, J. and R. Lawson, (2005). Economic Freedom of the World.
  14. Gwartney, J., Lawson, R. and Samida, D. (2005) Economic Freedem of the World. Annual Report. The Fraser Institute, Vancover.
  15. Halkos, G.E. and N.G.Tzeremes (2009). Exploring the existence of Kuznets Curve in countries. Environmental efficiency using DEAwindow analysis,” Ecological Economics,68 (7):2168-2176.
  16. Hall, Robert E. and Charles I.jones. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly journal of Economics, 114 (1), pp.83-116.
  17. Hauman, J.A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46:1251- 1270.
  18. Heerink, N., Mulatu, A. (2001). Income Inequality and the Environment: Aggregation Bias in Environmental Kuznets Curves. Ecological Economics38 (3), 359-367.
  19. Holtz-Eakin, D.and selden, T. (1992). Stoking the Fires? CO٢ emissions and Economic Growth. Journal of public Economics, vol.57, 85- 101.
  20. Huang, W.M., G.W.Lee, et al. (2008). GHG emissions, GDP growth and the Kyoto protocol: A revisit of the environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Energy policy, 36(1): 239-247.
  21. Hung, M. and Shaw, d (2000). Economic growth and Environmental Kuznets Curve in twain: A simultaneity model Analysis; working paper.
  22. Kane et al. (2007). Index of Economic Freedom. Heritage Foundation/ the Wall Street Journal.
  23. Kelly, D.L. (2003). On environmental Kuznets Curves arising from stock externalities. journal of Economic dynamics and control, 27(8): 1367-1390.
  24. Kuznets, S.S. (1995). Economic growth and Income inequality; American Economic review, 45, 1-28.
  25. Luzzati, T.and M.orsini (2009). Investigating the energy environmental Kuznets Curve. Energy Journal, 34(3):291-300.
  26. North, Douglass, (1995). The New Institutional Economics and third world development. In a book with the same title, edited by: Harris, John & Hunter, Janet and Lewis Colin M., Rutledge, London and New York.
  27. North, Douglass c., (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and Economic performance, Cambridge university press, new York.
  28. Shafic, N. (1994). Economic Development and Environmental quality: an Econometric Analysis. Oxford Economic papers, Vol 46, 757- 73
  29. Shafik,n.and Bandhopadhyay,s. (1992). Economic growth and Environmental quality: time series and cross country evidence; background paper for world development report, word bank, Washington,D.C.
  30. Stiglitz, J. (1998). The Role of Government in the Contemporary World; In Tanzi, V. & Chu, K. Y. (eds.) Income Distribution and HighQuality Growth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: the MIT Press.  
  31. Vollebergh, H.R.J., B.Melenberg, et al. (2009). Identifying reduced-form relations with panel data: the case of pollution and income. journal of environmental Economics and management, 58(1):27-42.
  32. Zhang, X-P. & C Cheng, X-M., (2009). Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and Economic growth in china. Ecological Economics, 68, 2706-2712.

Cite this Article: