The Evaluation of Productivity Growth in one of the Branch Bank by Using DEA Method and Tornqvist Index

Author(s)

Mohhamad Sadegh Horri , Masoumeh Goodarz ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 49-64 | Views: 415 | Downloads: 111 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3408037

Volume 2 - May 2013 (05)

Abstract

Productivity is access to resource optimal allocation and facilities in order to fulfill maximum production rate. Total factor productivity is a criterion for evaluation productivity rate at organization. According to fourth plan of development, total economic sectors of country is required that part of GDP growth in the country that provide it in during the fourth plan of development that is from place of total factor productivity of production. So based on, contribution to total factor productivity growth of services that financial institutions is it's appendix, the growth of production sectors and GDP prognosticate 21.9 per cent and of this rate is considered the process of annual growth of work force productivity, capital and total factor in order 6.5, 1.6, 2 per cent. The methods for calculating productivity are divided to two main sections such as parametric or nonparametric. In this research, by use of DEA that is an nonparametric method, At first, productivity (technical efficiency) the branch of Boroujerd Refah Karegaran Bank has been calculated during 20 years and so, with the efficiency of this model that is achieved by combination DEA and Tornqvist index, total factor productivity growth in this branch during 20 years has been calculated. The overall results suggest that productivity of production factors in this branch, the average annual growth is equal to 1.0019 per cent, is faced that is far from objective contained in fourth plan of development (2 per cent). 

Keywords

Evaluation, Productivity Growth, Bank, DEA Method, Tornqvist Index

References

  1. Alirezaee, M., Afshareyan, m. (2007). The presentation of integrated model of DEA models and Tornqvist index to calculate of TFP growth. Journal of Human Science, 3.
  2. Anderson, P., Paterson, N.C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39.
  3. Baris, S. (2007). DEA and benchmarks: an application to Nordic Banks. Annals of Operation Research, 82, 233-249.
  4. Caves, D., Christensen, L., Divert, W. (1982). The economic theory of index number and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrical, 50, 1393-1414.
  5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making unit. European Journal of Operation Research, 2, 429- 444.
  6. Fare, R., Grosskof, S., Lindgren, B., Roos, P. (1989). Productivity changes in Swedish pharmacies 1980-1989: A nonparametric approach. J. of productivity Analysis, 3, 81-97.
  7. Malmquist, S. (1953). Index number and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estaistica, 4, 209-242.
  8. Nishmizu, M., Page, J. (1982). Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: Dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia. The Economic Journal, 92, 920-936.
  9. Rezaee, J., Faghyh Nasiri, M., Tavakkoli, M.R. (2009). The evaluation of TFP changes in Tehran stock exchange by using Tornqvist index. Journal of Economy Researches, 2,103-122.
  10. Solow, R. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312-320.
  11. Tornqvist, L. (1936). The bank of Finland's consumption price index. Bank of Finland Monthly Bulletin, 10, 1-8.

Cite this Article: