Undergraduate Student Factors as Correlates of Scientific Literacy Levels in the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados
Author(s)
Babalola J. Ogunkola , Leah Garner-O’Neale PhD ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 65-73 | Views: 427 | Downloads: 113 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3408043
Abstract
This study investigated the scientific literacy levels of a selected sample of non-science undergraduate students of the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, and Barbados. The study sought to determine if the scientific literacy levels of the students were satisfactory and also if there were statistically significant differences in the scientific literacy levels of the students based on their course of study (social sciences, humanities/education and law), level of study (levels 1, 2 and 3) and age. It further sought to determine the extent to which each of these three selected variables individually and jointly affected the undergraduate students‟ scientific literacy levels. A sample of 314 students from three faculties participated in this study. Data were collected by means of „Scientific Literacy Test‟ (SLT) and analyzed using means, standard deviations, and linear regression. The results of the study revealed that the mean score of the participants in the test was 49.21% which implies that an average non-science undergraduate student in the university was below average in his or her scientific literacy level. There were no statistically significant differences among the mean scores of the students‟ scientific literacy based on course of study (F [2, 311] = .045; p = 0.956), level of study (F [2, 311] = 1.169; p = 0.312), and age (F [6, 307] = 0.570; p = 0.754). Moreover, the students‟ course of study, level of study and age were not significant predictors of the scientific literacy scores. Also, the joint effect of the variables was not significant in predicting the scientific literacy scores of the undergraduate students (F [3, 310] = 0.162; p = 0.922). In this study, the best predictor of undergraduate students‟ scientific literacy scores, though not statistically significant, was the age of the students.
Keywords
Scientific literacy, Undergraduate Students, Level of study, Sex, Age, Barbados, University of the West Indies.
References
i. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Science for All Americans Washington, D.C.
ii. Brewer, C. (2008). Scientific literacy in the classroom. Actionbioscience. American Institute of Biological Sciences.
iii. Bybee, R.W; Powell, J.C; and Trowbridge, L.W. (2008). Teaching Secondary School Science. 9th Edition. New Jersey, Pearson: Merrill Prentice Hall.
iv. CarrierDeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (37 (6), pp. 582 – 601.
v. Durrant, J.R. (1993). What is science literacy? In J.R. Durrant, and J. Gregory (Eds.), Science and culture in Europe (pp. 129 – 137). London: Science Museum.
vi. Good, R; Hafner, M; and Pebbles, P. (2000). Scientific understanding of sexual orientation: Implications for science education. American Biology Teacher, 62(5), 326 – 330.
vii. High Level Group on Science Education. (2007). Science now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Union.
viii. Hirsch, E.D., Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
ix. Hurd, P.D. (1997). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82; 407 - 416
x. Jenkins, E. W. (1994). Scientific literacy. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite. (Eds.). The international encyclopedia of education (Volume 9, 2nd edition, pp 5345 – 5350). Oxford, UK, Pergamon Press.
xi. McDonald, J; & Dominguez, L. (2005). Moving from content knowledge to engagement. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(3), 18 – 22. McPhearson, P.T.; Pollack, G.R.; and Sa
xii. ble, J.E. (2008). Increasing scientific literacy in undergraduate education: A case study from “frontiers of science” at Columbia University. http://columbiauniversity.net/cu/biology/faculty/pollack/public ations/essays-and-reviews/increasing_scientific_literacy.pdf
xiii. Miller , J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science. 7, pp. 203 – 223. UK, IOP Publishing Ltd.
xiv. Miller , J. D. (2007). The impact of college science courses for non-science majors on adult science literacy. A paper presented to a symposium titled “The Critical Role of College Science Courses for Non-Majors” at the annual meeting of the AAAS, 18 Feb. 2007, San Francisco.
xv. National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
xvi. Laugksch, C. R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education. 84(1), 71 – 94.
xvii. Laugsch, R.C. and Spargo, P.E. (1996). Development of a pool of scientific literacy test-items based on selected AAAS literacy goals. Science Education, 80(2), 121 – 143.;
xviii. Lewenstein , B. (2003). Science and Development Network. Retrieved 28th July, 2012. Hazen, R. M. (2002). Why should you be scientifically literate? Actionbioscience. American Institute of Biological Sciences.
xix. Heller, M. (2005). Topic of interest - Scientific literacy in Latin America: How are we doing? Educational Portal of the Americas. https://www.educoas.org/Portal/en/tema/tinteres/temaint55.asp x?culture=en&navid=36 . Retrieved 15th December, 2012.
xx. Salmon, E. (2007). Scientific literacy in higher education. Paper Commissioned by the Tamaratt Teaching Professorship.
xxi. Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ; Rutgers University Press.
xxii. Thomas, G. & Durant, J. (1987). Why should we promote the public understanding of science? In M. Shortland (Ed.), Scientific literacy papers (pp. 1 – 14). Oxford. UK; department for External Studies, University of Oxford.
Cite this Article: