Investigating Relationship between Internal Structure of Country Image and Product Attitude

Author(s)

Neda shakoori , Shamsoddin Nazemi , Fariborz Rahimnia ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 01-14 | Views: 396 | Downloads: 102 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3441771

Volume 2 - December 2013 (12)

Abstract

The formation of consumer’s attitudes toward products is rooted in different factors, including pricing, packaging, product design, brand, etc. Among these, this study examines the manufacturer's country, which in the international marketing literature is referred to as the Country image, and the relationships between its comprising components. Graduate and postdoctoral students of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad are considered as research population. The selected product in order to study the attitude is Automobile and four selected countries for studying country image are Germany, Japan, South Korea and China. Research data are acquainted and analyzed through 390 questionnaires distributed in June and July, 2013, in which the Cronbach's alpha is calculated as 0.91. Research hypotheses were tested by multiple regressions technique using SPSS 16.0 tool. Results confirm the triple structure of country image, indicating the country image’s effect on product attitude. Furthermore, according to study results, cognitive component of the Country image has the most significant impact on the Beliefs. it’s affective component has the most significant impact on the evaluation and conative component of the country image has the most significant impact on the purchase intention. Regarding to the internal structure of the Country image, results confirmed cognitive component’s influence on affective component; while the impacts of the affective component on conative component and cognitive component on conative component were not supported by research findings. 

Keywords

Country image, cognitive component, affective component, conative component, product attitude.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. A., D'astous, A. (1999). “ProductCountry Images in Canada and in the People's Republic of China”. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 11(1), 5-22.
  2. Ahmed, Z. U., Johnson, J. P., Yang, X., Fatt, C. K.., Teng, H. S., Boon, L. C. (2004). "Does country of origin matter for low-involvement products?". .International Marketing Review, 21(1), 102-120.
  3. Ashill, N. J., Sinha. A. (2004)., “An Exploratory Study into the Impact of Components of Brand Equity and Country of Origin Effects on Purchase Intention”. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 5(3), 27-43.
  4. Allred, A., Chakraborty, G., Miller, S.J.(1999). “Measuring Images of Developing Countries: A Scale Development Study”. Journal of Euro – Marketing, 8(3), 29-49.
  5. Bannister, J.P., Saunders, J.A. (1978). “U.K. Consumers' Attitudes Toward Imports: The Measurement of National Stereotype Image”. European Journal of Marketing, 12(8), 562-570.
  6. Berentzen, J. B., Bachhaus, C., Michaelis, M., Blut, M., Ahlert, D. (2008). “Does Made in …” Also Apply to Services? An Empirical Assessment of the Country-ofOrigin Effect in Service Settings”. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 7(4), 391-405
  7. Bilkey, W.J., Nes, E. (1982). “Country of origin effects on product evaluation”. Obermiller, C., Spangenberg, E. (1989). “Exploring the effects of country of origin labels: an information processing framework”. Advances in Consumer Research, 16: 454–459.
  8. Brijs, K., Bloemer, J., Kasper, H. (2011).“Country-image discourse model: Unraveling meaning, structure, and function of country images”. Journal of Business Research, 64(1), 1259-1269.
  9. Butt, A. R. (2001). “AComparative Studyof Pakistani Consumers' Country-of-Origin Attitudes Toward the Marketing Mix of Products from Germany, Japan and South Korea”. The Journal of Business Perspective, 49(5), 49-60.
  10. Byrne M.B.; Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/WINDOWS; sage publications, 1994.
  11. Cay, Yi., (2002). A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master Of Sciences Athens, Georgia, 1-90.
  12. Erickson, G. M., Johansson, J. K., Chao, P. (1984). “Image Variables in Multi-Attribute Product Evaluations: Country-Of-Effects”. Journal of Consumer Research. 11(4), 694-699.
  13. Fournier, S. (1998). “Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research”. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 343-373.
  14. Heslop L.A., Papadopoulos N., Dowdles M., Wall M., Compeau D. (2004). “Who Controls the Purse Strings: A Study of Consumers' and Retail Buyers' Reactions in an America's FTA Environment”. Journal of Business Research ,57(10), 1177-1188.
  15. Häubl G. A. (1996). “Cross-National Investigation of the Effects of Country of Origin and Brand Name on the Evaluation of a New Car”. International Marketing Review 13(5), 76-97.
  16. Hsieh, M. H., Pan, S. L. (2004). “Product, Corporate and Country.image Dimensions and Purchase Behavior: A Multicountry Analysis”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 251-270.
  17. Jaffe, E. D., & Carlos, R. M. (1995). “Mexican consumer attitudes towards domestic and foreign made products”. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 7(3), 7-27.
  18. Kothandapani, V. (1971). “Validation of feeling, belief, and intention to act as three components of attitude and their contribution to prediction of contraceptive behavior”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(3), 321-333.
  19. Laroche M., Papadopoulos N., Heslop L.A., Mourali, M. (2005). “The Influence of Country Image Structure on Consumer Evaluations of Foreign Products”. International Marketing Review, 22(1), 96-115.
  20. Lotz, S. L., Hu, M. Y. (2001).”Diluting Negative Country of Origin Stereotypes: A Social Stereotype Approach”. Journal of Marketing Management, 17:1-2, 105-135.
  21. Martin, I. M., Eroglu S. (1993). “Measuring a Multi-Dimensional Construct: Country Image”. Journal of Business Research, 28(3), 191-210.
  22. Nagashima, Akira (1970). “A Comparison of Japanese and U.S. Attitudes Towards Foreign Products”. Journ al of Marketing, 34(1), 68–74.
  23. Montesinos, M. A., Roth, K. P., Diamantopoulos, A., Bigné, E. (2006), “Country Image, Country Brand Equity and Product Preferences: A Test of Two Models”. The 35th MAC Conference - University of Athens - 23-26 May 2006.
  24. Obermiller, C., Spangenberg, E. (1989). “Exploring the effects of country of origin labels: an information processing framework”. Advances in Consumer Research, 16: 454–459.
  25. Ostrom, T. M. (1969). "The Rel ati ons hi p Between the Affecti ve, Behavi oral, and Cogni ti ve Components of Atti tude," Journal of Experi mental Social Psychology, 5, 12-30.
  26. Papadopoulos, N., Heslop, L.A. (2003). “Country Equity and Product-Country Images: State-of-theArt in Research and Implications. In: Jain S.C., editor. Handbook of Research in International Marketing. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar, p. 402-33.
  27. Pisharodi R.M., Parameswaran R. (1992). “Confirmatory Factor Analysis of a Country-ofOrigin Scale: Initial Results”. Advances in Consumer Research, 19(2), 706-714.
  28. Roth, M.S. & Romeo, J.B. (1992). “Matching Product Category and Country Image Perceptions: A Framework for Managing Country-of-Origin Effects”. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (3), pp. 477-497.
  29. Shimp, T. A., S. Saimee and T. J. Madden (1993). “Countries and Their Products: A Cognitive Structure Perspective,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,21(4),323-330.
  30. Shin, B. S., (2006). “What matten to Koman products in Austialia: Focus on the country image effects”. International AFea Review, 9(1), 173- 193
  31. Smith, N. (1990). Morality and the market. London: Routledge.
  32. Thurstone, L. L. (1931). "The Meas urement of Social Attitudes ," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26, 249-269.
  33. Verlegh P.W.J., Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. (1999). “A Review and Meta-Analysis of Country-of-Origin Research”. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521-546.
  34. Wang, C. L., Li, D., Barnes, B. R., Ahn, J. (2012). “Country image, product image and consumer purchase intention: Evidence from an emerging economy”. International Business Review, 21(1), 1041-1051.

Cite this Article: