Comparative job satisfaction of Public & Private sector Bank

Author(s)

Sangeeta malpani , Dr. M.G. Varshney , Rajsamand District ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 28-34 | Views: 350 | Downloads: 113 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3457681

Volume 3 - September 2014 (09)

Abstract

The banking system plays very important role to develop an economy by enabling it to be competitive and strong enough to face any financial problem and hence forms the core of money market in an advance country. The banking structure of every economy is going to change with the changing environment. Banks are the most significant players in the Indian financial market because they are the biggest purveyors of credit and attract most of the savings from the population. Banking plays very important role in the economic development of all the nations of the world because developed banking system holds the key as well as serves as a barometer of economic health of a country. As banking institutions are the backbone of a nation's economy, the well-organized management of human resources and the maintenance of higher job satisfaction levels influence the growth and performance of an entire economy. The Indian banking sector is a fast-growing financial service sector that has seen remarkable progress after nationalization. The Indian banking system can be generally categorized into "scheduled commercial banks" and "non-scheduled commercial banks". Scheduled commercial banks can be further classified into public sector banks, private sector banks. Over time, differences have been observed between public sector banks and private sector banks in terms of various operational and efficiency parameters. 

Keywords

Comparative job satisfaction,  Private sector, Bank Employees, ICICI and SBI

References

  1. Barrows, D., & Watson, T. (n.d.). “A comparative analysis of job satisfaction among public and private sector professionals”. Retrieved, from: http://job-satisfaction 2.htm
  2. Bhushan, L.I. and P.N.P. sinha (2008) : "Job satisfaction in Public and Private Sector Banks." Indian Psychological Review Vol 27
  3. Brest et al (2006) “Predicator of job satisfaction” Sage Publication.
  4. Castillo, J. X. and Cano, J. (2004) Factors explaining job satisfaction among faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education 45(3), 65-74.
  5. Chowdhury, Neel, "Privatizing in India: Bank's Thorny Path," International Herald Tribune, August 16, 1996, p. 17.
  6. David, B., & Wesson, T. (2001). “ A comparative analysis among public versus private sector professionals”. The Innovation Journal, 19 (15), 28- 45.
  7. Desai, V. (1987) “ Indian Banking, Nature and Problems.” Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House
  8. Dolliver, M. (2003). “ Job satisfaction.” A weekly article publishing, 44(38), 38.
  9. Graham, M.W., & Messner, P.E. (1998). “Principals and job satisfaction”. The International Journal of Educational Management, 12(5), 196-202.
  10. Metle (2002) “Determinates of job satisfaction of an employee in an institute.” Indian Psychological Review. Vol 28. Nath, Dr. Onkar: Principles Of Banking, Published by Rajiv Beri, 2005, P. 377.
  11. Sargent and Hannum (2005) "Manager behaviour & Job Satisfaction." Indian Journal of Banking relation Vol. 3. Welman and Kruge (2001, p. 11) “Techniques of research.” Mc Graw Hill, New York.
  12. Wright, Bradley E,. 2001. “Public sector work motivation: A review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model”. Journal of public administration research and theory.
  13. Victor S. Desantis. & Samantha L. Durst.(1996).“Comparing job satisfaction among public and private sector employees” American review of Public Administration, vol. 26, No. 3, September 1996.

Cite this Article: